• db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Win10 sucks but Win11 manages to suck harder. And neither in the good way.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Damn. Bastards.

      Tells us all we need to know though.

      LTSC costs, wish I could convince more clients to spend the money. A 10 year license!

      • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Unfortunately I don’t know, I only heard about the support duration from one of our systems IT guys. Even if it isn’t more expensive (or even if it’s cheaper) companies will prefer the longer license because IT staff migrating these machines costs a lot of money (and sometimes the migration isn’t without problems which costs even more) so they try to minimize the frequeny of migrations as much as possible.

        • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ive been out of touch with that stuff for awhile, which why I asked. Just the shorter duration is ridiculous, I’m assuming that’s the tip of the iceberg.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 months ago

    Because there’s no discernable benefits. Few applications, if any, require Windows 11. The average desk worker gets new-software-paralysis any time there’s an interface change. Windows 10 is still viable and receiving updates.

    The better question is: Why would companies switch?

  • shani66@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Windows 11 went full mask off on how bad Windows really is, why would anyone use it? No one wants adware, ransomware, or spyware on their pc, let alone have it baked in.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wtf? None of my systems can be upgraded. Win11 is a huge artificial hardware upgrade push with bullshit minimum requirements that prevent an install from even occurring. Not that I feel like I’m missing out. It is a shitshow of an OS.

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m not upgrading because I don’t trust Windows 11. Not that 10 has my confidence, of course, but 11 seems worse.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    My Win 10 laptop wouldn’t install Win 11, so I upgraded to Linux. Hoping there’s many more like me.

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Does anyone else remember when Microsoft claimed windows 10 would be the last windows? Probably more than half the applications I use for work do not work properly on a machine running windows 11. We know this because we tried. A controlled rollout ended in a roll back to windows 10 for the company I work for. It’s not that difficult to understand. Something about weird aspect ratios in our legacy software (that we are required to use) making drop downs and clickable buttons completely unviewable. We were able to use windows 8 compatibility mode on our windows 10 computers but that doesn’t fix the problem on windows 11. The company that created that software isn’t doing more than bug fixes and security updates for it and so this problem will never be rectified. That’s why.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Almost all” then “many” then “the majority”. Does this hack know those things aren’t synonyms? 🙄

  • kowcop@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    Because Windows 11 is yet another painful transition for staff who are mostly IT illiterate folk, and it easier to leave things the way they are until necessary…

  • Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Not sure how exactly this survey was conducted, here at the small business I work at only about 2% of the desktops/laptops are Win 11 compatible. And being a small business the owner isn’t interested in spending the $$ on new systems until absolutely necessary.

    But that’s on the small business side, maybe this article is only talking about fortune 500 companies? Their results seem a bit odd to me otherwise.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, I’ve got a few thousand PCs at work (not all mine) and we’re maybe 70% compatible. I’ve been doing a lot of reprioritizing upgrades to get those ones done before daddy IT security compliance starts looking critically at us.

  • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    No idea. Our company went full Win 11 since almost all of our systems are browser based and everyone is on modern laptops. I don’t really have an issue with Win 11 itself over Win 10. Outlook being buggy is honestly more annoying day to day.

    That said, if IT would let me use a MacBook I’d switch instantly. It’s inexcusable to have to wait 10 seconds or more for my laptop to wake up in 2024. WTH Microsoft.

    • ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Until last year they made the task bar for the computer illiterate (ie Mac/gnome users). Thankfully they fixed that.