• HyperCube@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I feel like a lot of people are forgetting about survivorship bias as well. If all the people who supported the blackout left Reddit, then the only people left would be the ones who aren’t in favour :)

  • KillaBeez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Maybe all of those in favor of the protests kept their word and only those who are against it remain?

    • Appie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t miss Reddit. I checked some comment sections and holy hell is it toxic compared to here. I think part of that is because of what you’ve mentioned in your comment.

      • soulless@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I used to work for this major company, biggest in my country by far.

        Whether it was going well or poorly, they tended to offer severance packages to “cut back” on their staff, to appease the grotesquely overpaid consultants that analysed their finances.

        What tended to happen, was that the most qualified people, who had no issues finding another job (often better paying), took those packages (I took home a one year salary after having worked there almost three, then had two months vacation and started a better paying job), which left those who didn’t really have other options, those who did the bare minimum and had a lot of useless meetings.

        I guess that’s what reddit is heading for. They are alienating those who contribute the most, the content creators, the mods and the ones who like to engage others. They will be left with their bots, lurkers, racists, reposters and porn-spammers.

        Good riddance.

      • SpookySnek@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ever tried having a discussion in any of the default subs? If your opinion differentiates from the hivemind you will be downvoted as spam, without any responses. It completely defeats the purpose of a “discussion”

  • Kachajal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    For better or for worse, spez was correct in claiming that this will just blow over. People in general are shit at boycotts, redditors doubly so - there’s barely any group cohesion or leadership there.

    The people who see an issue with reddit’s current behavior have left, the others will just keep going on a much shittier platform. As it has ever been.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah reddit likes to talk a big game but generally speaking they’re not very good at sticking to anything. You see it a lot in the various gaming subreddits too, whenever a company releases a broken/underwhelming game. They’ll spend about a month saying “this is the worst thing to ever happen, this is the end of the company, I’ll never buy another thing from them as long as I live” and then a month later it’s all just memes of people playing that game and a year or two later it’s full of hype for the next one.

  • vamp07@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have no intention of unsubscribing from Reddit. The recent move that company has taken has made me hostile to them as a platform. I am far more probable to engage over here and just lurk over there when I need to find the answer to something. To the extent that I can I want to help the Fediverse takeoff and replace Reddit and twitter.

  • Alkalyon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    This comment is incorrect as well.

    The people that cared left and what’s left behind is people that wouldn’t leave anyway and the strike only bothers them.

    This person is living in a bubble and can’t see further than their nose.

  • Debs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The hardest part for me was realizing how shit Google search is without appending reddit.

  • Hunter Hog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Reposting something I wrote in another community I hang out in, but it feels appropriate to the topic:

    I won’t pretend “Reddit is dying” or anything of the sort, but I have noticed something interesting (that is maybe something I should’ve noticed long, long ago), and that is that subreddits have an insane concentration of whiny entitled lurkers that seem to want content catered and spoonfed to them.

    During this whole debacle, I’ve seen creators and enthusiasts that drive the traffic be perfectly content creating elsewhere because it was more about expressing their passion of a topic than cultivating some kind of audience. No matter the alternative they chose, they have plenty of outlets for their creation. But everyone else hates this. All of the bitching about blackouts that I’ve seen haven’t been “man I wanted to post cool shit” but more “where am I supposed to get cool stuff from?”.

    In general, what I’ve seen is a slight decline in activity, but a sharp decline in quality. Comparatively, my experience in Lemmy thus far has been that people creating were fine moving elsewhere to do their thing, and while communities are still small, I’ve seen a lot more long-form, thoughtful and respectful discussion because everyone there was a creator and enthusiast about that topic. Looking at the profiles of people commenting, they’ve typically posted at least once in that community already.

    Meanwhile on Reddit, since the blackout wore off on certain subs, I’ve seen a lot of this:

    [In the original, here would be an image of a typical current comment thread in a blackout-related post, but the context of it is explained below anyway]

    Where people who bitch about the blackout because “but I wanted to discuss x!!” are then invited to discuss exactly that, and the conversation goes something along the lines of

    “I wanted to discuss x!”

    “Oh cool, me too. I like x y z about it, though I preferred if x was like this instead, and maybe z could be polished a little more”

    “Well, idk I like it”

    “ok 👍”

    or just

    “i like this”

    “i like this too 👍”

    because they don’t actually have any proper formulated thoughts or opinions on the subject beyond surface-level observations, brand identity or attachment, or if they do have them, they don’t have the drive to create or lead conversations about it and just lurk waiting for said content and thoughts to be delivered for them.

    Which makes the already bad state of egregious repost bots rising to the top because people keep upvoting the same topics over and over even worse.

    In a way, I guess it’s kinda similar to what happened with 9gag when that hit critical mass.

    To expand on this, I also find it interesting and perplexing just how far that entitlement goes. Moderators are on the verge of losing critical tools, and they’re essential in maintaining the quality of the discussions held. Creators create the topics of discussion, and are the main driving force in setting the baseline quality of said discussions, and as power users are more likely to be the ones to depend on third party apps to create the content people browse.

    Both seem fine with the situation, and/or migration, and very understandably go “Hey we feel disrespected on this platform and are moving to x where we feel we can thrive better without external influences deriding our community” and lurkers, who contribute nothing and have the least barrier of entry because they essentially just need to change the url they search the same terms in, stomp their feet and cry “but I want you to discuss things for my entertainment HERE!!!” like two year olds.

    Edited to add, here on Lemmy:

    I’m hopeful that this situation will show moderators they can curate a dedicated community anywhere with similar (actually relevant) post flow and quality, but without enduring the abuse of the platform they host it in and a bunch of on-lookers. I really hope they don’t buckle in the name of “but we’re already established / have so many people / are such a good resource” because all these things can be true elsewhere without receiving death threats or mod mail spam for doing the right thing.

    • Micromot@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not all lurkers are like that(not really disagreeing with you though) I would consider myself to be a lurker because i only occasionally comment and even more rarely.post. I rarely comment because i know my wording can be a bit weird so most people don’t get it at the first read and somtimes I’m not up for a discussion. I also rarely post because i don’t know if that specific thing is worth posting or i just don’t know how i think about the topic or something weird

  • p05@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I noticed that. I made a comment saying something along the lines of me disagreeing with mods going public after only 2 days and got downvoted like crazy but not three days ago it would of been the other way. Just honestly done with that site anyway so going to download wikis from the subs that come back and be done with it.

  • instamat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    The fediverse is the way. I’m not smart enough to say if it’s the best option, but it’s a hell of a lot better than a profit driven monolith run by out of touch investors. Reddit won’t implode but it won’t be the same as it was even a week ago. This decentralized structure is what the internet wants to be.