I’m sorry for the bad rule, but rule number rule rule.

EDIT: I’m glad people like and are discussing the post. For the record though, I posted this for the funny number lol

    • stembolts@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Percentage of gross annual earnings from the year of the crime.

      0-100% sliding scale decided by a judge based on crime severity.

      Let the public veto the fine (back to a new judge) via referendum if they deem it too lenient. Rinse and repeat. Let the public get some punches in because corps have been swinging down at us for over a century.

      The fact that this is “too democratic” to be realistic is a sign of the times, imo.

      • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        The offenses that can only be committed by the rich against the poor are never criminal. Unless the rich get screwed over too, there’s never any jail time.

  • kautau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 months ago

    Trump’s FCC appointees voted in favor of massive corporations having no punishment or accountability for being shitty?