

Can anyone find independent reports of this massive celebration for the announcement of the results of the Francis Field Trial in 1955?
Edit: Found a Wiki summary
Can anyone find independent reports of this massive celebration for the announcement of the results of the Francis Field Trial in 1955?
Edit: Found a Wiki summary
But will it cost $1M to the inauguration or $15M to the Trump library?
Ha ha. Both sides are the same!
Another “me too” here. My take is “How do you know what an alien looks like?”
Doesn’t America deserve a big “Fuck you” after the last round of voting? You don’t care about ethics or even legality from your President? Ok, here you go.
And leftists will not vote for Democrats because they didn’t stop Republicans from coming into power in 2024.
Yep. This isn’t a problem for adults.
Biden should have seized absolute power and instituted authoritarian communism for the good of the people.
Trump nominates candidates, and the Senate confirms them. This letter urges not to confirm and is addressed to the members of the Senate.
He’s trying to bash his adversaries here by bringing it up on an unrelated post.
Thanks for putting that plain text from the top of the post into a jpeg down in the comments.
Can’t see one of these things without now picturing it carrying an explosive up to some soldier and detonating.
A coin flip is an analogy for both sides having equal probabilities of winning. The original comment argued Democrats were consistent losers in Presidential elections. If their win rate could easily be accomplished by coin tosses, that’s obviously not true.
You weren’t reading what I was writing all along, so the block doesn’t really make a difference.
This just means she is eminently qualified for the job.
My claim was that Democrats aren’t consistent losers, and it’s ridiculous to treat them as such because of the result of the last election. Your counterexample fails to dispute that. 5 wins out of 9 or 11 losses out of 19 are not differentiable from a coin toss. Same with 1 loss out of 1, 1 loss out of 2, 2 losses out of 3, 2 of 4, 2 of 5, 3 of 6, 4 of 7, 4 of 8, 4 of 9, 5 of 10, 6 of 11, or even 7 of 12 (going back to first Reagan win).
Unless, of course, you discount some or all of the wins post hoc with silly excuses.
My point regarding stats: If you flip a coin 19 times and you get 8 heads, there is a 16 point spread between the frequency of heads and tails. Should we conclude the coin is unevenly weighted?
I’d hate to see your conclusions in a stats class.
I think that answers it well enough. Big pharma buys a lot of leads from small pharma, but I think small pharma could fill the pipeline pretty well without ruthlessly exploiting it quite as much.
I wasn’t sure if you were a natural remedy type nut. I now take your statement to be hyperbole since a lot of people die from car accidents. Only some of those can be blamed on big pharma making a treatment too expensive or getting the other driver addicted.
I heard it was a straw man, and then I read your comment.