I mean yes, of course it could happen in the wild. It would be inevitable. AI just spits out what its been trained on, and enough thorns snuck in there, it might start appearing in AI-generated content. It’s as expected behavior as seeing a reflection in a mirror.

But I encourage you to continue fucking with AI every way you can. I just learned about some ways invisibly poison images for training (Nightshade).

you know we can all see your comment history

and what would be gained by seeing llm do it? it would be liking getting a tattoo just so you could see it in a mirror.

The atatckers shared a link to what appeared to be a Microsoft document, prompting the victim to log in. Obviously, the login page was bogus, and the login credentials were relayed to the attackers instead.

Yeah, well, train your users to log into Microsoft several times a day because they keep getting kicked out, what do you expect to happen.

Yes.

The probe, reportedly tagged ’Lilac Typhoon’ or ’Tifón Lila’, follows a warning from US authorities. If you live in or invest in Chile, this matters because telecoms hold your calls, messages and data. A real intrusion could mean widespread privacy fallout.

It’s a hilarious to me that the United States is warning Chile about China doing something that the US does as a normal course of business. ICE knows where everyone’s been because it buys our telemetry data from cellular providers, and you can bet the feds have backdoors into everyone’s cloud services, including Microsoft and Google.

Hard to read this article outside the context of the United States constantly meddling in South American politics.

The thing about tracking cell phone is you don’t need a vast network of spy cameras to do it. The cell companies sell all your telemetry data (where you’ve been as determined by your cell connections–almost as good as GPS) to ICE every month.

Plus your cell phone is basically a surveillance device; that’s why android was developed by an advertising company: to gather information on you.

If you want to break free of that, you have to get an alternative version of the operating system (like Graphene aka GOS) and you have to get off every google service and application (gmail, contacts, calendar, sheets, docs, chrome). And then you might have a chance at privacy.

It seems like there could be good potential implementation of AI into the overall system but nothing is more satisfying to administrators than firing people, so that’s how its success will be judged.

By pro-socialist, do you mean pro-Soviet-style totalatarianism?

Thanks for the tip! I actually need to work on my french, so now I know what to look for when I open PeerTube by accident instead of NewPipe.

You’re describing a ridiculously wide swathe of tech topics.

I’m guessing you’re going to tell me these people fail a purity test of yours, but content creators have to put out a LOT of content and it’s very likely one of their videos will be off. The question is not if a creator makes a mistake or a bad call, but how they respond to it.

• Right-to-repair: Louis Rossman
• Anti-AI: Ed Zitron (The Tech Report?)
• General mockery: SAMTime, occassionally Angela Collier

That’s pretty fucked up. I’ve been to a shooting range in my state and it I think they designed it so it’s impossible for bullets to escape. I mean, maybe if you wanted to shoot through the roof you could manage it.

And would you like to make a comparison to people? I see people do shit that would “fail basic driving skills” every goddamned day, and sometimes its me doing them.

Given how bad humans are at maintaining attention, the standard that self-driving be perfect is a little silly. The standards debate should START at “no worse than the average driver.”

I do know that sometimes signs are banned from protests if they use sticks, because sticks can be used as melee weapons. Yet, your right to carry an M-16 in the streets–maybe even into congressional chambers during votes–is wholly protected.

It is completely stupid.

Those are just the jet lagged kids from the Austrian family in 27B.

Do you like Rummikub?

$55bn will buy a lot of pride and accomplishment.

While I am a body-positive feminist and think everybody should love the body that they have, I think regulating giant boobs would be a mistake. First of all, it would turn women’s bodies into a legislative battleground, which I don’t think women need more of in our overly-politicized environment. Secondly, there are many horny men who love to masturbate to giant tits, and banning them would drive them into the arms of the right–now is clearly not the time for that. Third, huge knockers create much-needed jobs in the medical industry. Do we really want to take away jobs from doctors and nurses? Fourth, with the declining economy, sex work–whether OnlyFans or direct services–are becoming necessary outlets for many women, are we going to deny them a definite boost to their income? They could also likely apply for handicap plates with these gargantuan breasts, which would save them time getting to their johns from the parking lot. Finally, and most importantly, banning enormous jalopies would just make the left seem more radical, more extreme, and just downright unreasonable, which would hurt other parts of our agenda such as Medicare for All, guaranteed childcare, and subsidizing housing (all of which I also oppose).

Sincerely,
New York Times Editorial Writer

“An injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” --Paul Reubens (Pee-wee Herman)

People who read books are a different breed. I wouldn’t worry about them.

But if we’re going to make a lazy heuristical stand against AI, I’ve always enjoyed the liberal use of semi-colons.

Borders?

Just dropping this here:

https://newrepublic.com/article/159662/libertarian-walks-into-bear-book-review-free-town-project