The X2 peaks at 4 G’s, which is average, since rollercoasters range from 3 to 6 G’s.
Oh my God this is that downing in canals chav
Are you going to post this question weekly now?
Only until they get the answer they want. They’re probably a cop
It’s not the canals conspiracy user, is it?
Was that the guy who was claiming there was no way people could drown in a cannal and newspapers (and eyewitnesses) were lying?
using the past tense seems optimistic, but yes
They got some pretty good answers in that thread…Which only adds to your belief that they’re a cop.
There were some very good explanations in the last post, have you tried reading those?
As it turns out, there’s a lot more factors towards the safety of a rolls coaster asides from peak force. Mainly, you have swift changes in force due to rapid changes in speed or direction. A gradual increase in force is safer than a quick burst!
glad this is at the top. came to say it had more things than just speed. it has the wierd freely turn around thing. Since it was an old coaster it would be good for them to figure it out for future coasters though.
Other factors might include the design of the car (how it distributes the force, for instance), the rails (friction, tolerances, etc.), or the environment (decorations around the roller coaster, lighting effects, sound, etc.)
