Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com to memes@lemmy.world · 3 个月前Not like anyone wants to shoot up in the bathroomlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square106linkfedilinkarrow-up1882arrow-down133
arrow-up1849arrow-down1imageNot like anyone wants to shoot up in the bathroomlemmy.dbzer0.comNot_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com to memes@lemmy.world · 3 个月前message-square106linkfedilink
minus-squareDiplomjodler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up98·3 个月前I don’t want to pay for other peoples’ healthcare so I’d rather pay a lot more for an oppressive police force that also takes away my civil rights.
minus-squareentwine413@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up80·3 个月前While still paying for other people’s healthcare because that’s how insurance works.
minus-squareCarbonIceDragon@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up39·3 个月前Not to mention the societal costs that inevitably come from people being sick
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up22·3 个月前The real “fiscal conservatives” are the “bleeding-heart liberals.”
minus-squareMiles O'Brien@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·3 个月前Turns out, productivity soars when you have a well rested, well compensated, well treated, healthy, and housed people who don’t have constant stessors of literally every aspect of their lives nearly crumbling beneath them…
minus-squareTower@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up13·3 个月前But then how are you supposed to subjugate them???
minus-squarerah@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 个月前Yeah but then how would the rich and powerful feel good about themselves?
minus-squareouthouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 个月前Okay but if there’s infrastructure then the idea of structural forces wont seem so alien to people, and they will be harder to oppress. So maybe the crazy idea you just pulled out of your ass isnt quite so clever in the real world, hm?
minus-squareJerkface (any/all)@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-23 个月前That is incompatible with growing wealth disparity. And the rich will always try to get richer.
minus-squareouthouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-23 个月前No, its the anarchists; libs still means test everything. Edit: we’re also for slashing government spending!
I don’t want to pay for other peoples’ healthcare so I’d rather pay a lot more for an oppressive police force that also takes away my civil rights.
While still paying for other people’s healthcare because that’s how insurance works.
Not to mention the societal costs that inevitably come from people being sick
The real “fiscal conservatives” are the “bleeding-heart liberals.”
Turns out, productivity soars when you have a well rested, well compensated, well treated, healthy, and housed people who don’t have constant stessors of literally every aspect of their lives nearly crumbling beneath them…
But then how are you supposed to subjugate them???
Guns.
Yeah but then how would the rich and powerful feel good about themselves?
Okay but if there’s infrastructure then the idea of structural forces wont seem so alien to people, and they will be harder to oppress.
So maybe the crazy idea you just pulled out of your ass isnt quite so clever in the real world, hm?
That is incompatible with growing wealth disparity. And the rich will always try to get richer.
No, its the anarchists; libs still means test everything.
Edit: we’re also for slashing government spending!
Hell yeah! high five