DISCLAIMER: I’M NOT FROM USA.
From the outside looking in, it seems like at least half of the inaction of the “left” is because ol’ Chucky just hinders everything.
“We wrote a strong letter” was probably the first time I actually, genuinely didn’t understand how he’s still the leader of the party.
Since then I’ve done some digging, and it seems like the guy is actually quite delusional. Not even his imaginary friends vote for him, which is kinda sad. Understandable though.
Now he’s talking about voting on whether they should block the military action in Venezuela. The ongoing one. The one that’s been planned publicly for months.
So, how does he still have his job?
Think of it like a ratchet mechanism. He’s not there to move things left, he’s there to keep things in place while the right takes a little break to twist up the tension even more.
That’s how the left works in the US now: They’re not actually there to create change or movement, they just hold the place and keep things from moving until the right can get back in power. They don’t do anything but act as a placeholder for real change - they hold their position until the right puts their screws into things again and twists us further to the right.
It’s…ridiculously obvious once you notice it.
The simplest explanation is that the oligarchs have assured him he’ll continue getting his salary if he continues being ineffective.
His leadership position was voted on before the DNC chair.
So his threats to cut off funding to the state of any Dems that wouldn’t back him still had some teeth.
It doesn’t now, mainly because the DNC immediately jumped into the largest twin esture into state parties, ever.
He’s been a lame duck all but maybe a month of this senate leadership term, and will almost certainly lose it next year.
If he doesn’t, it’s a bad sign.
The problem is simple. Congress and Senate treat their job like jobs. Not sworn duties.
At the end of the day they don’t give a damn about the USA and will always accept checks from special interest.
His job is to lose and stall when instructed to by nazis, and he is a goddamn genius at doing it (though a dumbass for failing to see how dumb it is to do that)
Point is, he’s doing his job: losing.
… because he was elected.
Major chunks of the country will always vote for the same party. That’s why you hear talk about blue states and red states. He’s in a safe area, so he has a negligible chance of losing even if he does a terrible job.
How does/did Schumer, Grassley, Graham, Pelosi, McConnell, Feinstein, and so on, stay in power? I always get downvoted and naysayed when I say this, but American voters fucking suck. Just the absolute worst. People will blame the two party system, and they do have a point there, but those same people don’t show up in the primaries to make a difference. They’re too scared to vote for change, as they’ve shown over and over. Just a bunch of ignorant, self-satisfied, cowards.
We did show up to the primaries enough to make a difference in 2016. We voted for Bernie Sanders as our candidate. The DNC told us all to go fuck ourselves, they’re a private institution, they can do whatever they want, the votes are just a formality, and appointed Hillary Clinton as the Democratic candidate instead.
Please, tell me more about how it’s fault of the voters.
Ah, I thought that Hillary ended up getting more votes. I must be wrong. I’m in no way denying the fuckery that went along with it, from the DNC to media doing everythign they could to keep Bernie out, but in the end, voters are the ones who vote. Tell me again about how it’s not ultimately the voters. And most tellingly, we weren’t discussing the presidency, which is a whole bag of issues, but Congressional representation. Fucking voters 100%.
Fun fact Chuck Schumer doesn’t even pretend that he works in favor of his Democratic constituents. No Chuck Schumer’s entire career is based off of serving the needs of the Baileys. A fictional couple he invented that he bases all of his ideals rhetoric and legislation around. They are Republican. Look this up if you never heard before it’s the weirdest fucking thing.
Oh yeah, Baileys are the imaginary friends I was referring to. Thanks for reminding me!
It’s pretty simple really he gets money from Israel and the oligarchs to pretend he’s opposed to things in the weakest and least convincing way possible. He’s doing a good job at the job of pretending to be opposed to facism while preventing any movement left so he continues to get paid to do that.
This is, sadly, how it seems to be. Both he and Hakeem Jeffries seem to obstruct real opposition from the Democratic Party against Trump and the Right in any meaningful way.
It’s every democrat since Clinton and every Republican since Reagan. Carter was the last real president this country had.
They’re the party of the status quo. They’ll probably take 50 years to reinstate the rights lost by this administration.
I can alreadyhear them now. “We need something to campaign on next time.” As though doing your fucking job isn’t something you can campaign on.
The Baileys’ votes each count as 100,000+ votes
AFAIK he was OK during Trump’s first term, back then it was Pelosi holding back.
Now he is making the same mistakes Pelosi did.Mistakes, yes. Unintentional, no.
The fact of the matter is that if Democrats had been elected, there would have been no invasion of Venezuela, nor Iraq two decades ago.
Let us not kid ourselves. Non-voting eligible American voters let trump take the reins again, with control of Congress and the Supreme Court, knowing he could pull shit like this at any moment, yet still sat on their lazy asses TWO Election Days, fondling their purity, bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe LoL, and now they’re like… “C’mon Schumer… dazzle me and my most excellent purity over here!”
Elections have huge consequences, so spare us the righteous outrage. Whatever blood gets spilled, it’s also on those soft, tender, lily-white hands of non-voting deadweights.
Also, twice is a pattern: “Vote for a woman?!! Me?!! When PIGS FLY!!!”Correct. Instead, dems would have declined to roll back any of those laws “so we have something to campaign on next time” until voters get fed up with their ineffectiveness and vote R next time. THEN, we get the invasions.
There hasn’t been a single war that the DNC hasn’t been bloodthirsty to get into. Iraq was bipartisan and Biden expanded the bounty on Maduro to $25m. House Democrats just gave $8b more in funding than what was requested for war.
When you consider that the Democrats’ job is to offer only token resistance and lose elections, you realize he’s doing his “job” very well.
