• Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    28 days ago

    The thing currently costs at least 50% more than the closest equivalent LiFePo4 from the same brand. The only real advantage seems to be it’s ability to handle sub freezing temperatures, but usability still drops dramatically (both capacity and available power delivery). Everything else is straight up worse in this one in direct comparison.

    It’s only the first product, so it’ll most certainly get better. Also as numbers of products sold rise, costs fall. Once these are cheaper, that are a real choice.

    • tty5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      28 days ago

      CATL wholesale pricing per kWh is already almost 50% below lifepo with a goal of sub $20/kWh pricing in coming years.