Zerush@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 months agoProduct improved by AIlemmy.mlimagemessage-square30linkfedilinkarrow-up1506arrow-down18cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1498arrow-down1imageProduct improved by AIlemmy.mlZerush@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 months agomessage-square30linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareLe_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoyou’re misunderstanding the analogy. this is a fundamental problem with analogies.
minus-squareZerush@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoI understand that adding an chatbot to an product don’t make it more practical, when you find even a Toaster with AI. Also an design made with ChatGPT insteatof research can also result in an absurd crap, halucinating not only in chats.
minus-squareVampire [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months ago‘fundamental’ would mean it applies to good analogies, not just wrong ones
minus-squareLe_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoit does. an analogy is not 1:1 and if it was it wouldn’t be an analogy, it would just be the thing.
minus-squareVampire [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoThat’s getting a bit too vague for me. How is giving people a chatbot like giving paraplegics pedals? Nobody has explained it yet.
you’re misunderstanding the analogy. this is a fundamental problem with analogies.
I understand that adding an chatbot to an product don’t make it more practical, when you find even a Toaster with AI. Also an design made with ChatGPT insteatof research can also result in an absurd crap, halucinating not only in chats.
‘fundamental’ would mean it applies to good analogies, not just wrong ones
it does. an analogy is not 1:1 and if it was it wouldn’t be an analogy, it would just be the thing.
That’s getting a bit too vague for me.
How is giving people a chatbot like giving paraplegics pedals? Nobody has explained it yet.