• iridebikes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Same is true in America. If immigration is up and immigrants cause crime, why is crime down?

    Almost as if it’s willful delusion to push a narrative. A group of people covering their eyes and ears and lying through their teeth to radicalize people to their sick cause.

  • pedz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    This reminds me of a Republican politician interviewed on TV being told that crime rates were down, and him replying “but I don’t FEEL safe”.

    Reality doesn’t matter.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m sure a huge part of this is actually racism as this post suggests but these two graphs aren’t really equivalent. The first graph is only assault with sharp objects, the second one covers posts about crime in general.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    169
    ·
    8 days ago

    Fear mongering right wing media machine goes brrrrrr

    Same thing in Germany with crime in general constantly dropping while anti immigration sentiment keeps rising under the excuse of “violent immigrants”

    • amniotic druid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      US too, crime has been dropping for decades but we apparently need a Gestapo force to go after criminal gangs

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 days ago

        The curious thing about US crime statistics is that we only count crimes against the state. We never count crimes committed by the state.

        I would argue that US Crime has been sharply on the rise, from within the organs of the government itself (and its corporate affiliates).

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          The definition of “crime” is pretty much controlled by a small number of people and it ain’t a crime if there’s no law against it.

          Always remember that the mass murder of Jews and Roma in NAZI Germany wasn’t a crime because it was all legal. Similarly, Slavery wasn’t a crime in most of the World, and even today in many countries, such as the US some forms of it (for example using prisioners as forced labour) aren’t a crime.

          We’ve been indoctrinated into in everyday speech conflate Legality with Morality (as its very useful for those who control lawmaking for the riff-raff to unthinkingly shun those deemed law-breakers and side with law-enforcers), so IMHO it’s a good idea to, once in a while, remind oneself that Laws are made by Humans, not Gods, and the reasons for Humans to make Laws as they are, are messy and the results themselves are often bad and easy to selectivelly interpret and abuse, something especially bad in ages like the one we live in when widespread political corruption is pretty much standard.

        • amniotic druid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          True but I didn’t want to get into the nitty gritty and just comment on the conservative “crime in the streets!!” fantasy

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Rightwingers keep trying to make Cali look like a crime ridden cesspool and Texas the peak of law and order, but crime statics between the two are marginal. They tend to shutdown whenever I cite sources on that.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        which they arnt, because actual gangs will shoot you on sight. thats why the FOR-PROFIT prisons and gop is freaking out that thier CASH cow is drying up.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      A common trope of this kind of “Press” in the UK was (no idea if still is, as I left Britain some years ago) the “many generations of the same family living on benefits (i.e social security)”, which was part to greater far-right picture they very purposefully painted of poor people as leeches.

      Somebody actual went and researched it and found out that in the whole of Britain - home to over 40 million people - there was a grand total of 3 families with 3 generations living on benefits, 4 if you count the massive stippend the Royal family gets from the British state as “benefits”, though they’re filthy rich and don’t actually need it.

      A common schitck of the far-right propaganda to selects a handful of people who are assholes and happen to be part of a social group said far-right wishes to slander and point them out as if they’re representative of whole group. They do this for everybody, not just immigrants and it’s not just them doing it: for example, notice how news coverage of demonstrations from some News organisations tends to focus of the handful of people destroying things rather than on the majority who are behaving peacefully, something incredibly common in pretty much the whole of the UK press, even the supposedly serious one.

  • Windex007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    8 days ago

    Because I don’t understand correlation vs causation, I can only conclude that the monetization of X caused a steep decline in knife violence

    • draco_aeneus@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      These two graphs cover different time periods. It looks like the monetization of X lines up with that hump of sharply increased knife crime at the end there.

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think that it’s true specifically because you don’t understand correlation vs causation

      /s

  • bizarroland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I’m gonna keep ringing this bell until people sit down and reread chicken little

    The foxes want you to believe the sky is falling.

    They want you panicked, so they can control you.

    Their intent is to devour you.

    The correct reaction is to not listen to them.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      And while we’re at it, un-ban all the silly things that they used your baseless hysteria as a purported justification for banning.

      Knives for everybody! All shapes and sizes.

      • bizarroland@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        If everybody has a knife, then nobody has one.

        Instead of getting smacked on the butt, newborn babies should be handed a switchblade so they can protect themselves.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 days ago

          Agreed.

          Also, if everybody has a knife, the cartel that slaps those impossible-to-tear plastic collars over the necks of bottles of salad dressing and soy sauce will no longer hold any power over us.

  • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    8 days ago

    Nothing on X is organically viral now. Elon is the ultimate powertripping admin, and he will shape his website however he wants

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Is this supposed to highlight that he’s white, highlight that there’s non-white admins who powertrip more, or be a play on using irrelevant data to muddy the waters of critical thought?

        I just want to be sure what subtext you’re using.

      • Djehngo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s generally not even Londoners re-posting crime “news” about the capital (we live there, so we know) it’s more certain people from rural areas who neither live, work or visit London.

        Those certain people are either the ones who have a chip on their shoulder about how London is a success despite not catering exclusively to white native born people, or people who just got sucked into an alternate reality where they read so much crime news that everyone in London must get stabbed once a year.

        There is also a healthy dosage of conflating per square mile and per capita crime

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Be careful using the word “conservative” if you’re discussing UK politics - it’s literally the name of a (mainstream) political party.

        • jpeps@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’d like to think that the person from feddit.uk knows that! I obviously don’t know you’re background either but FYI I’d say that this sentence does just refer to a generally conservative person. In the UK we don’t really refer to individuals by their party name directly like Republican/Democrat in the US etc. Someone who literally votes Conservative you might refer to as a tory, though there’s not really parallels to other political parties. Sorry if this not news to you!

          • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Regardless of the whole big c / little c argument I’d still be hard pressed to find one person that was alarmed with falling crime figures…

            I assume (perhaps incorrectly) that the poster meant a “knee-jerky, xenophobic, Reform / BNP / UKIP / English Alliance etc. voting Londoner” because, yeah, that headline would be counter to their narrative.

            • jpeps@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              I think that’s exactly what they meant, and that they would be troubled by a headline that challenges their world view.

              • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                Almost. The thing with the conservative mindset (referring to right wing authoritarianism generally, not Tories in particular) is that they are motivated by fear of others. Sorry for causing confusion, I’m not from here originally and I don’t even make sense back home, sometimes.

                The graph illustrates a divergence between real knife crime and fears about knife crime on X (where the blame is seemingly laid on monetisation of posts).

                The dot I’m connecting mentally here is that preferential treatment is being given to fear-based posting about crime and minorities, which is exactly what you would do as a billionaire who wants to buy a mass media platform. A tale as old as semaphore, that.

                So, the idea of a right wing Londoner getting spooked by suspiciously boosted, factually misleading scare content promoted by an even richer, more right wing bastard kind of makes me laugh. They’re driving each other crazier and crazier all the time, and ultimately it’s not all that funny.

                • jpeps@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Thanks for clarifying and sorry for speaking for you 😅

                  To be fair, as far as I can tell the stats here are a bit misleading. Hospital visits from kinfe crime are down, but general knife crime was at its highest in 2025. I don’t know what the specifics are of that though.