• dudleyflippendoodle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s already shredding naturally. At least this process contains it for longer than it otherwise would, potentially reduces more shedding from tires, and gives it some purposeful existence while we come up with better ideas.

    Better than just letting it rot somewhere, right? At least, that’s my take. Maybe it’s wrong, but it’s not the worst idea I’ve ever heard.

    • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Mixing it with a binder, effectively embedding it into a semi buried rock a seems like a slightly safer option than letting it sit out in the sun to be broken down by UV.

      • dudleyflippendoodle@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not sure there are any “safe” options tbh but I’d rather it serve some purpose if it’s just going to break down either way, for sure.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Who is leaving it in the sun? It’s supposed to be capped off at a landfill. Where it is sequestered to some degree. Any other use liberates the thousands of virtually unregulated additives, and the microplastics themselves.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You realize the microplastics are still released from a capped landfill, right?…

          I’m not necessarily saying this is a better option, but you’re talking like a capped landfill is the best solution out there, and hand waving any argument against it.

          There’s also the problem of landfills taking decades to fill, with UV breaking down the topmost layer, heat breaking down internal layers, and water flowing through (and needing to be treated in the best case scenario).

    • brendansimms@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      and what are the odds that whatever company that is contracted to do the work does not use recycled plastic and instead shreds new plastic, because it is cheaper.

      • dudleyflippendoodle@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I guess that’s up to whatever process is used by municipalities to decide between vendors, and would encourage you to persuade your local government not to do this should they consider this strategy.

        I dunno man. There are no perfect solutions for dealing with plastic waste at the moment. Until we have one, there are worse ways to go about handling it.