• sartalon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Did they use data from 20 years ago?

    No way this is even close to being accurate.

    Unless they changed the definition of middle class to, “make enough money to afford rent and nothing else.”

      • sartalon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lower bound, middle, upward bound, I don’t give a shit what fucking name they gave it. It’s still worthless bullshit.

        There is NO FUCKING WAY that a household making that income would have any lifestyle traditionally associated with “middle class”.

        I don’t know if you’re smoking pot or a Republican apologist trying to make the economy sound better than it is, but using their qualifier as somehow defending the obvious nonsense this dataset is, is absurd.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah this is a joke.

      I just looked at the Zillow’s current average rent for 2 bedroom dwellings in a few states.

      Yeah, most of these incomes, if they are household incomes, are basically on the threshold of the ‘Makes 3x more than the rent’ number, either slightly above it or slightly below it.

      So ‘middle class’ apparently means 2 bedroom apartment/townhome/home, that you are renting.

      In the 90s, middle class was more like… you have a 3 or 4 bedroom house, that you have a mortgage on, with a front and back yard, 2 - 3 kids, 2 - 3 cars, maybe also a small boat or camper or jetski or something.