Except for the people getting genocided, but we’ve decided they don’t count as part of “everybody.”

Never. These are already his preferred candidates and he just wants you to shut up and eat your slop like a good little boy.

Well don’t let me stop you from supporting diet maga then, I’m sure the world will improve immensely with your corporate funded genocide supporters in charge…

Are you gonna post the same memes insulting half the democratic voters until they lose the midterms?

These posts just feel like pure projection on your part.

I’ve heard so called “liberal” media discuss and condemn Hassan Piker more than I’ve seen them discuss and condemn Trump and all his lackeys combined.

They’re the definition of controlled opposition.

Given how many countries the US has victimized, it’s at least a little comforting to know they’re getting some of it turned back on them.

They had a chance to make things better, unlike so many other countries. They had it good for decades, only to blow it all up for some narcissistic, billionaire pedophile. Fuck em.

Where’d he get pants that size? Did he rob it off a Ken doll?

The people depicted on those statues didn’t want monuments built to them in the first place. That’s the difference between Trump and those guys.

They might have been racist upper class douchebags, but they didn’t want to be remembered for their part in the most destructive and pointless war on American soil. They had a sense of shame, something Trump doesn’t have.

Confederate generals didn’t build those. The Jim Crow South did a hundred years later to piss on the civil rights movement.

80 something year old head of state dies

It isn’t Trump

Keep trying, Universe. You’ll get there eventually.

It took Lincoln hours to die. Getting shot in the head isn’t as instant of a death as most people think.

Yeah, and Trump is one of most unpopular. People compare the two and Trump looks bad in comparison and he hates that. So he badmouths Zohran now.

Nobody stays in Trumps good books forever. Certainty not if they outshine him.

Well, he DID like him. For a while.

Trump likes winners. But if they make HIM look like a loser, not so much.

I mean, it’s not like they aren’t still taking it away. They praise her and her charity only to take all they can away from it while nobody’s looking.

He’d be in the bottom 15. The problem with ranking Reagan is that most of the big issues with him didn’t become fully apparent until long after he was out of office. When you make a list like this it’s kinda hard to fit all the awful US presidents in a top 10.

All the president’s between 1840 and 1860 alone deserve to be somewhere in the bottom 15 for endlessly supporting slavery and setting the stage for the civil war, which makes fitting Reagan in kinda difficult.

Only because we have a firm understanding of their legacies. If I made this list again in 40 years there’s a good chance he’s in 1st place.

From bad to worst:

10th: Nixon

9th: Bush

8th: Wilson

7th: Hoover

6th: Tyler

5th: Harding

4th: Pierce

3rd: Trump

2nd: A. Johnson

1st: Buchanan

He’s in the bottom ten, but is currently getting overshadowed by someone in the bottom five.

That makes him look better by proxy.

The one that writes him love letters and changes his diaper on the daily? The one that sleeps in the locker room when he stays a Maralago and hides in the trunk of his car to stay close to him?

No, I can’t imagine her to have anything but a professional relationship with the rapist in chief.

There are way more eyes on the annoying orange than there ever were on the turtle man.

There’s no way someone wouldn’t anonymously report it to the media or massively fuck up and spill it in some other way.