“Hey gemini, pls tldr history of social-revolutionaries”. Just shut up and dont embarass yourself. Dont try to narrow my original answer and read the wikipedia at least.
With every answer Im more and more convinced you live in american suburb or some.
The fact you have no idea who social-revolutionaries are, means you gave a huge rant about your views, meanwhile having no idea how the most important socialist revolution went. Or even such a simple thing like socialist democratic consensus of pre-60s Congratulations you are a fucking tankie. And I dont get paid to explain history to americans. May your extremist pseudosocialist brainrot mythology stay with you
It is possible. We had socialist consenus not that long ago :/ The only possible way to achieve at least near-socialist system is democratic. If the system does not directly represent views of their citizens, eventually you get oligarchic corpocracy with planned economy, that will crush all the nations beneath their boots. Furthermore: Bolsheviks were fucking extremists. When post-revolution parliament was established, and parties ran for seats, the majority of votes were Social-Revolutionaries, bolsheviks didnt have nearly as much votes. But then bolsheviks just shut down the parliament because they lost, and put their opponents in jail or even executed. So much for the people’s republic ig.
Instead, we need to actually get support in southeen countries, fight US hegemony and get votes in european countries, but this time hwlping global south first would be priority, so the european and us capitalists couldnt move their capital to poorer parts of the world and thus destroy the socialist consensus.
Wait, we have to move Israel to Utah
Their political activity is remarkable. It is the kind of activity every country needs. Only problem i see is that french activists put the most effort into protests instead of more effective ways of spreading their ideas.
Proud of you skill opening people’s profiles. Maybe your smooth brain isn’t that much of a problem to get along with motorical tasks you had to suffer through when making 2 clicks :/
Whatever floats the bloat of your demagogy
It fun and sad at the same time …
How old are you? 13? , bro
Bullshit, we put a little gap.
Ubuntu is the reason why I hated Linux first. It is crappy bloatware, that is hard to use. You have to open terminal to install deb files, and you have no idea you had to install nvidia driver. Snap packages are attrocity someone caught dead using.
KDE Plasma desktop was the best, then it helped me get into tiling. (Mint is also really cool)
Yes I can. They did not bother to nuance their position, going fully into soviet empire propaganda. My grandfather was sent to gulag after soviets occupied baltic states, and he died presumably from starvation and overworking. I wish I could tell him that actually he is supposed to be alive, according to alternatively gifted delusional people from .ml
Also there are examples of getting to planned economy without autocracy: Salvodor Allende’s Chile, anarchist societies in Ukraine in 30s, Yugoslavia (kinda), etc.
Ew what atrocity. Doesnt even contain azodicarbonamide and potassium bromate, we Americans eat!
Tankies are not communists , they are delusional children , believing that hardcore autocracy can help getting to socialism. But in practice you get state funded oligarchy killing its people, arresting and disappearing its independent worker’s unions.
deleted by creator
I genuinely think that there has to be some kinda bracket for voting on age-restriction topics in EU parliament. Because those old people in parliament are so out of touch with the technology and how children behave nowadays, but they still vote for degenerate and retarded shit like chat control, believing that it is worth to surveil 400 million people, just to result major outflow of cybercriminals to other communication channels.
I dont like conspiracies, but what if eventually their goal is to just send all criminals into free and open solutions, then ban these solutions , because they’re used by criminals.
What I meant is that bolsheviks were not popular nor they ever represented people of russia. And you still cant bother to read how the revolution went. Any totalitarian ‘socialist’ regime is not socialist, it is purely oligarchic corporcracy. Why corpocracy? Because both USSR and China busted worker unions, had hilarious elections, prevented regular people from becoming politicans or have any say. And ensured only their oligarchic circle could get to power. How is this different from authoritarian capitalist corporacy? Corporations also have planned economy, they also bust their worker union, and they also keep their people in fright of the state machine.
This kind of system is just as far from socialism as a late-stage capitalist state, and serves capitalists and imperialists.