This is the first time in about 15 years that he will finally see the sunlight.

  • SCmSTR@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unfamiliar with the person. What’s he infamous for? What sort of chodelicious behavior defines him to you?

    • jherazob@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here’s a post from 2021 about this person giving some background. I recall even a change.org petition requesting them being banned.

      Also, you might recall them for making the news recently after banning an artist from /r/art because they said a piece by them was made by AI, and when proven otherwise they said that it was obviously based on AI and that they should find a better style, which escalated to the point that the sub was temporarily closed

      Seeing that person going down is a nice piece of justice in this shitstorm. It happened for the wrong reasons, admins should have removed this person long ago and didn’t, but at least it’s something.

            • JasSmith@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah that mod went full mask off. Sadly there were no repercussions. All men are created equal, but on Reddit, some are created more equal than others.

          • JockJam DoorSlam@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sincere question, because I used Reddit frequently but I pretty much just stuck to just commenting and posting in my niche little interest subs. So I’m learning all kinds of new issues and drama about the site/company itself I was in the dark on before lol. So I’ve only seen bits and pieces of what awkwardturtle’s whole deal was, and it struck me as being so over-the-top that I assumed it was farcical, like someone who hates those kinds of social progressive ideals and wants to mock them and make them look bad. Not sure if that’s a correct read at all, though, or how likely it is.

            Like “locking so men can’t comment” it so inflammatory and petty, I do live in a very liberal city and am involved in many different areas of social progression both personally and professionally and I cannot think of anyone who would actually believe in, say, or do things like that. Not only because the majority of sincere feminists believe in equality between all genders and not “misandry” period, but also because it makes the whole movement look like garbage. No one sincere in their beliefs would play so heavily into the dumb stereotypes in such a public and visible way like that. It’s like someone who wants to make fun of feminists vs being an actual feminist.

            Not to say there aren’t people in those ideological groups who don’t totally miss the point and do actually say and believe stupid shit like that, but they are such a minority and a thorn in the side for those of us doing real work to make actual progress. So powermod could be sincere and just fully out of touch with what they are choosing to align themselves with.

            But idk. I’ve just seen so many other examples of their word choices and such that is just really inconsistent with what actual social progressives would say or do. My understanding is that he’s a man, but he mods the women’s sub. Like an actual male feminist wouldn’t insert himself in that space in such a way, spewing queer stereotypes in queer subs, etc. Seems so off the mark to me that I didn’t think it might actually be sincere lol

            • Wren 🪐@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              This makes loads more sense than anything else. Everything they’ve said has always been a little too on the nose trying to be ‘’ ‘‘woke’’ ‘’ (is double quoting a thing? Hopefully my meaning comes across as intended)

            • Serinus@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              It was meant to be petty and inflammatory. It’s not about any kind of equality or justice or movement of any kind. Bringing those things into it just muddies the waters and makes things more complicated than it needs to be. It was 100% a mod power tripping and enjoying the fact that no matter how bullshit the reason, nothing would be done.

            • Lemminary@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              someone who hates those kinds of social progressive ideals and wants to mock them and make them look bad

              Ahh, that makes more sense. Some people are shitty down to their core. Yuck!

            • Edgerunner Alexis@dataterm.digital
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean, there’s a whole huge contingent of “feminists” getting popular these days who have explicitly and extremely bioessentialist misandrist beliefs, TERFs, so sadly I’m not super sure you’re right, but it’s entirely possible. You do tend to have to look holistically at people’s actions and speech to figure out what they really believe, oftentimes.

      • SCmSTR@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not gonna lie, I don’t understand at all. What is in the picture? Books? Why can’t men make books?? Locking the comments? What is rule 6? I can try to infer what may have happened, but people are both very sensitive but people are also very shitty so I don’t want to just guess.