This stupid topic again

But sure

  • PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:@towns.gay
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    @mozz I’m not blaming you, I’m just saying that having a potential presidential nominee who is most frequently referred to by the public at large by a first name only is unusual and sets her apart from previous (male) nominees in ways which may unwittingly add to some voters’ already present feeling that perhaps she’s not really serious or experienced enough because she’s a woman.

      • PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:@towns.gay
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        @mozz I would just try to mix it up a bit: Kamala Harris, VP Harris, the vice president, etc. Compare it to however you refer to male/white politicians in everyday speech and just try to balance it. If you’re calling Biden Joe or referencing a conversation between Bernie and Kamala or whatever, no problem. What really shouldn’t happen intentionally or not is unequal parallels like “the VP debate between Kamala and Vance” or “Biden and Kamala need to articulate their message better.”

        • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Tell you what

          I’ll start calling her “Harris” and see how that seems. Like I say, I think you kinda have a point that it has a subtle impact even if the way it got arrived at has nothing to do with misogyny.