Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., has issued a dire warning to her party about the chaos that could ensue if they succeed in pushing President Joe Biden off the ticket. And she criticized Democrats whoā€™ve given off-the-record quotes that suggest the party has resigned itself to a second Trump term.

InĀ an Instagram Live video on Thursday, Ocasio-Cortez warned liberals that a brokered convention could lead to chaos, in part because she says some of the Democratic ā€œelitesā€ who want Biden outĀ alsoĀ donā€™t want Vice PresidentĀ Kamala HarrisĀ as the nominee in his place.

ā€œIf you think that is going to be an easy transition, Iā€™m here to tell you that a huge amount of the donor class and these elites who are pushing for the president not to be the nominee also do not want to see the VP be the nominee,ā€ she said.

Ocasio-Cortez claimed none of the people sheā€™s spoken with who are calling onĀ Biden to drop outĀ ā€” including lawmakers and legal experts ā€” have articulated a plan to swap out the nominee without minimizing the serious legal and procedural challenges that are likely to ensue.

Ocasio-Cortez also highlighted the racial, ethnic and class divisions that appear to have formed between the majority of thoseĀ pining to blow up the ticketĀ ā€” led mostly by white Democrats and media pundits ā€” and those elected officials who feel they and their constituents have too much at stake to upend the process at this point and so are willing to do the work to re-elect Biden-Harris. She alluded to this cultural divide in her video when she spoke out against anonymous sources expressing a sense of fatalism on behalf of Democrats about what might happen if Biden remains on the ticket:

What I will say is what upsets me is [Democrats] saying we will lose. For me, to a certain extent, I donā€™t care what name is on there. We are not losing. I donā€™t know about you, but my community does not have the option to lose. My community does not have the luxury of accepting loss in July of an election year. My people are the first ones deported. Theyā€™re the first ones put in Rikers. Theyā€™re the first ones whose families are killed by war.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Manā€¦ I donā€™t even know anymore. Manchin has only remained a Democrat due to the deep history of unions in his state. Heā€™s the definition of DINO.

      If he no longer needed to only worry about the votes of West Virginians, he could drop the farce altogether, and switch parties as soon as heā€™s sworn in (or at the very least, rule as a Republican would have, and cripple the Democrats in our legislative branch).

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      Ā·
      5 months ago

      https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/21/opinion/biden-west-wing-aaron-sorkin.html

      But thereā€™s something the Democrats can do that would not just put a lump in peopleā€™s throats with its appeal to stop-Donald-Trump-at-all-costs unity, but with its originality and sense of sacrifice. So hereā€™s my pitch to the writersā€™ room: The Democratic Party should pick a Republican.

      At their convention next month, the Democrats should nominate Mitt Romney.

      Nominating Mr. Romney would be putting our money where our mouth is: a clear and powerful demonstration that this election isnā€™t about what our elections are usually about it, but about stopping a deranged man from taking power. Surely Mr. Romney, who doesnā€™t have to be introduced to voters, would peel off enough Republican votes to win, probably by a lot. The double haters would be turned into single haters and the Nikki Haley voters would have somewhere to go, Ms. Haley having disqualified herself when she endorsed the leader of an unsuccessful attempt to overthrow the government.

      Does Mr. Romney support abortion rights? No. Does he want to aggressively raise the minimum wage, bolster public education, strengthen unions, expand transgender rights and enact progressive tax reform? Probably not. But is he a cartoon thug who did nothing but watch TV while the mob he assembled beat and used Tasers on police officers? No. The choice is between Donald Trump and not-Trump, and the not-Trump candidate needs only one qualification: to win enough votes from a cross section of Americans to close off the former presidentā€™s Electoral College path back to power.