Based of a work of Aubrey Beardsley

  • HauntedBucket@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    No, you’re clearly right. Implying it’s your own through silence is an ethical thing to do.

    • Rutty@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Oh please, you immediately posted the source.

      And I immediately confirmed it.

        • Rutty@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          More honestly though.

          Referencing makes a lot of sense with helping improve ‘art’. Think of When you practice in art class the warmups they give where you draw a picture. I think the most informative critique is when there is a reference to compare to.

          • HauntedBucket@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            You’re a good artist. What really caught my eye was exactly how spot on your duck drawing was to my non-professional eye.

            I hope you keep at it.

            EDIT: I just reread your comment. I don’t mean to make it sound like recreating other people’s art is the problem. Of course practice is important and existing stuff makes a comparison easier, I’m 100% in agreement with you. Please don’t stop. But i think it’s also easy for someone to have seen your art and assumed it was original. This is a place where showing off original work is accepted and “practice” doesn’t indicate originality one way or the other.