I understand that it may be problematic sometimes but this was very smooth. I didn’t even say anything.

A: what’s your number for the whatsapp group Me: I don’t have whatsapp because of facebook. B: ok, we have to use signal then A: ok

And that was it. Life can be very easy sometimes

  • doctortran@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    That just feels like shooting themselves in the foot. Just inform the user SMS isn’t secure. That’s it.

    Not being willing to trust the user with the information so they can make a choice is asinine. It’s the same reason why I stopped using Tuta. Complete privacy and security are great but if there’s no option to make things a little more open for the sake of convenience or interconnectivity, I’m just not interested.

    Security and privacy shouldn’t be a prison.

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      You can’t target UX to the average person. It won’t work for most people. You need to target those that struggle with technology the most to make it accessible.

      Signals main unique selling point is its security, not its ease of use. If people fall into useing signal in a insecure way, it can be hard to say signal is a secure messaging app. As many people may be using it insecurely.