cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ninja/post/22012

Click here for YouTube video

BattleBit Remastered, a 254-player FPS game, is currently stealing the limelight on Steam despite being launched in the already crowded market of first-person shooters. Developed by a team of only four people, the $15 indie game quickly became a top seller on the platform. Its success is especially notable since it competes against numerous free, well-supported shooters, yet still manages to outperform even popular titles like Call of Duty.

What’s particularly appealing about BattleBit, however, isn’t just its gameplay, but its pricing model. Instead of following a free-to-play model, BattleBit costs $15 upfront. But this purchase comes with the assurance that players will receive a fully-featured game with no extra hidden costs. The game currently includes six classes, 39 unlockable guns, dozens of class-specific gadgets, 17 destructible maps, and community server support, among other things, making it a great value for its price.

This model stands in stark contrast to the typical free-to-play games that tend to start with a modest offering and then add more content over time. These games often feel like they are always looking at the player as a potential target for further monetization, with constant reminders about battle pass buy-ins and overpriced skin bundles. This approach can lead to players feeling like they’re being asked to invest financially and emotionally in the game’s future potential, rather than simply enjoying what the game offers in the present.

BattleBit, with its upfront price and a promise of no further monetary strings, is refreshingly different. It’s fun, well-balanced, and surprisingly intense for a game with blocky characters and low-detail environments. The robust proximity chat feature also adds an additional layer of immersion and social interaction, with players often role-playing and communicating with genuine conviction during the game.

Despite its minor shortcomings, like the lackluster sound effects for its guns, BattleBit’s previous anonymity has worked in its favor, much like Eric Barone’s Stardew Valley. Gamers come in with zero expectations and are often pleasantly surprised by the depth and quality of the game. Even if future updates don’t materialize, many players feel they have already received their money’s worth from the initial purchase. The game’s focus on present value, rather than speculative future updates, appears to be a winning strategy in the eyes of its growing fanbase.

  • drifty@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Using FACEit anti cheat (which is kernel level and the company is Saudi Arabian) and dropping Linux is a bad look. The game also doesn’t have any sound effects except for bullets. The moderation for proximity chat is also very strict, beware.

      • drifty@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        On sale, maybe it could be worth your time, but even without microtransactions, the game doesn’t hold up to its 15 dollar price tag due to these huge drawbacks

      • drifty@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Can’t swear much, even topics that can be discussed are restricted (it sounds like I’m saying debating is not allowed in an FPS game which is absurd, I’m just saying like you can’t do anything outside of interacting within the game about the game)

    • priapus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      They didn’t drop linux support. They’ve said there will be servers using faceit and others using eac.

      • drifty@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        But the servers using EAC will not be part of the trophy progression system is what they’ve said. That essentially renders it useless anyway.

    • MrEUser@lemmy.ninjaOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t really consider it a “boomer shooter,” that’s why the title has a question mark in it. But it is fun, and the graphics make it something I figured I could talk about. The part I like most… no microtransactions. Of course this comes with the downside of anti-cheat as it’s a multiplayer game… I guess you can’t have it all.

        • MrEUser@lemmy.ninjaOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Agreed, I’m taking a HUGE liberty classifying it as such based SOLELY on the voxel graphics… But, since I’m the writer, editor, and hobbies t doing this… I’m okay taking liberties on occasion for a game that only costs $15 and has no micros transactions. I REALLY do want to support this idea. I just wish they made it for iPadOS/iOS.

          • weirdo_from_space@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Maybe they will someday, you can ask the devs. That’s what Linux users do 🙂

            I’m just glad we hear indie success stories from the multiplayer side too. Mainstream multiplayer is trash.

            • MrEUser@lemmy.ninjaOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              I agree, this is why I’m trying to highlight indie devs. I’m not perfect at it (I’m barely good), but I enjoy what I do. Thanks for reading.