From Vanceā€™s penchant to ā€˜create storiesā€™ to Trumpā€™s false claims, lies are brazenly flaunted as a tactic to win support

JD Vance was holding court on CNNā€™s State of the Union programme. ā€œThe American media totally ignored this stuff,ā€ he complained last Sunday, ā€œuntil Donald Trump and I started talking about cat memes.ā€

But it wasnā€™t just a meme, objected interviewer Dana Bash. The Republican vice-presidential nominee gave a telling response: ā€œIf I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then thatā€™s what Iā€™m going to do, Dana, because you guys are completely letting Kamala Harris coast.ā€

If ever there was a case of saying the quiet part out loud, Vance had perfected the art. The cat memes he referred to were prompted by baseless rumours about legal Haitian immigrants in his home state of Ohio eating house pets ā€“ rumours that led to bomb threats and evacuations of schools and government buildings in Springfield.

But Vanceā€™s willingness to ā€œcreate storiesā€ to grab attention before the Novemberā€™s election hinted at a new frontier in post-truth America, where a lie is no longer slyly distributed but rather brazenly flaunted as a tactic to win political support and stir up social chaos.


šŸ—³ļø Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    Ā·
    3 months ago

    Republicans are more authoritarian on average, and authoritarians tend to value in-group cohesion more than anything else. They are, by some reasonable metrics, bad people.

    If I remember correctly, there was a study where they did like a model UN, and they secretly put all the people who scored high on authoritarian personality tests in group A, and everyone else in group B. Group B did fine- no wars, dealt with climate change and what not. Group A, with the authoritarians, caused a nuclear apocalypse. And after they got a do-over (after they had to sit in silence for a few minutes to think about what theyā€™d done), they still fucked it up. edit: I found it: https://theauthoritarians.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/TheAuthoritarians.pdf , page 30

    Weā€™re all at least a little susceptible to authoritarian, in-group-above-all thinking. But some people have it bad, and those people suck. Theyā€™re really ruining it for the rest of us.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      value in-group cohesion more than anything else

      This is shown quite clearly in their belief that people get gender reassignment surgery just because of (liberal) peer pressure. It shows how important the opinions of others are to them.

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      The realization that there is nothing we, as individuals, can really do about it hits like a brick šŸ§± But, yet, we keep fighting. Because to give in is defeatist, and frankly, boring.