• pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    3 months ago

    I really don’t understand why they’re simultaneously arguing that they need access to copyrighted works in order to train their AI while also dropping their non-profit status. If they were at least ostensibly a non-profit, they could pretend that their work was for the betterment of humanity or whatever, but now they’re basically saying, “exempt us from this law so we can maximize our earnings.” …and, honestly, our corrupt legislators wouldn’t have a problem with that were it not for the fact that bigger corporations with more lobbying power will fight against it.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      There is no law that covers training.
      You guys are the ones demanding a law that doesn’t exist.