According to GIMPS, this is the first time a prime number was not found by an ordinary PC, but rather a “‘cloud supercomputer’ spanning 17 countries” that utilized an Nvidia A100 GPU chip to make the initial diagnosis. The primary architect of this find is Luke Durant, who worked at Nvidia as a software engineer for 11 years

  • Urist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Yeah, fuck those assholes that pursue science for the benefit of humanity! I do not see why anyone should be allowed to be creative if I do not see the benefit for me in particular.

    • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      We need to decide democratically what science is, with everyone getting a fair vote, so wasteful science like this can finally be stopped.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Like voting on which science is right lol?

        That’s how we end up with solar roadways…

        • Urist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Much of the basis for the RSA cryptosystem, and by extension much of modern computing, was done by some mathematician who prided himself that his work was not applied mathematics and could not ever be applied in any way (bonus point for being pertinent to the topic of large primes). Science is exploratory work, not a straight path to some predefined goal. The person above is evidently clueless as to how science is conducted.

        • Urist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Now I want to try too: The ultimate form of democracy is when people are voting with their wallets. Then they can have the freedom to express both what they want and how much they want it. That is why profitable = good and freedom, actually.

      • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think we have already done that and you just disagree with what we have agreed to categorize as science. This shouldn’t stop you from making your own computers and have them do whatever you’d like though.

        Because, well…. That’s democracy.