Matt Gaetz running the justice department. Fox hosts in charge of the Pentagon and transportation. Elon Musk as head of layoffs. And Robert F Kennedy Jr and Dr Oz overseeing the nationās health.
Some have likened Donald Trumpās administrative picks to a clown car; others are calling our incoming leadership a kakistocracy, or āgovernment by the worst peopleā, as Merriam-Webster puts it.
The word has been trending online, with a burst in search traffic in recent weeks and a new dedicated subreddit. Itās not the first time Trump has (accidentally) made the term famous; many discovered it in his first term. But the kakistocracy of 2016 looks like Mister Rogersā Neighborhood compared with the president-electās new batch of sidekicks.
If you donāt like that guy, you you can look to all the other security experts that are calling for a manual recount.
incidentally, spoonamore isnāt known for making that claim every election, heās made it twice, The other time was in 2004 when ballot interference occurred.
Look Iād be happy with a recount. I think they should recount, just to be as sure as possible. What Iām not OK with are conspiracy theories and lies.
I was there in 2004. Lots of conspiracy theories were pumped on the blogs that were ultimately unfounded. If I recall, Stephenās āexpert claimā pertained to Ohio and that claim was spurious.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_United_States_election_voting_controversies
The steal in Florida was real but it came in the form of a phone call, not a software exploit.
these are the facts Jack, and facts donāt care if you donāt like them.
also, conspiracy does not equal untrue.
a conspiracy is a group of people planning to carry out or carrying out a scheme.
that happens in the real world everyday.
itās fine if you donāt like that one guy, ignore that one guy.
Focus on all of the other computer security experts stating that because of trumps lawyers admitting they hired a group to steal voting machine software, and their stated intention to interfere with the election, we should do a manual count to make sure that all the ballots are legitimate.
you can ignore that one guy and listen to all the other scientists you donāt have a problem, who you claim to agree with, with who have 19 credible sources supporting the electoral obligation for a manual ballot count.