kopper [they/them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 month agoruleskymedia.d.on-t.workimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1136arrow-down134
arrow-up1102arrow-down1imageruleskymedia.d.on-t.workkopper [they/them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 month agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-squarekrimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·1 month agohow do they make money? there’s no ads and it’s free
minus-squareTriflingToad@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·1 month agoYouTube was like that too
minus-squarekrimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 month agoeven if they suddenly put ads on it (which would be stupid since no ads is one of their main selling points) it’d still be better than twitter/threads
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·30 days agoPhase one enshittification. They’re burning VC money to acquire users, who they will then betray.
minus-squaremorphballganon@mtgzone.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·29 days agoSo, baseless speculation?
minus-squaregfle@szmer.infolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·29 days agoI’d rather say that it’s “learning from history of similar services”. Facebook also seemed nice in the beginning.
how do they make money? there’s no ads and it’s free
YouTube was like that too
even if they suddenly put ads on it (which would be stupid since no ads is one of their main selling points) it’d still be better than twitter/threads
for now
Phase one enshittification. They’re burning VC money to acquire users, who they will then betray.
So, baseless speculation?
I’d rather say that it’s “learning from history of similar services”. Facebook also seemed nice in the beginning.