• tortina_original@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    Republicans love $ too. So, a fraud scheme, yeah?

    That is a truly simplistic way of looking at things. Don’t. I am as left as you can possibly be and yet I absolutely hope that bitcoin and blockchain tech would take off.

    When I say blockchain tech, I don’t mean shiity scam coins, I mean “election data on an immutable public ledger” type of tech…

    One can dream.

    • sardaukar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      You don’t want elections anything mixed with computers until computer architectures are more robust and verifiable. Not to mention that to mess with elections takes much fewer resources when they’re digital than when you have to corrupt thousands of vote counters.

      Just gonna leave this here https://xkcd.com/2030/

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Exactly. I used to want digital election, and then I thought about it for half a second a realized how stupid that is.

        I’m 100% in the camp of universal mail voting. We can use machines to count votes, statistics and manual counting as a check against bad machines, and individuals can check if their ballot was counted properly. Blockchain can potentially be a part of that, but it should never be the core part.

        I don’t trust voting machines at all, paper ballots all the way. Maybe eventually we can do public key crypto, but not now.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’m with you. However, the current state of things is not what I envision when I think of decentralized currency and immutable public ledgers.