(link is to the Supreme Court’s opinion document)

  • IcedCoffeeBitch@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am pretty new to politics and I align more with social democracy, but I’ve always being curious about anarcho communism and it isn’t about losing scientific advancements or everyone for themselves. I think an anarchist would argue that these things are possible and in fact encouraged, but that they should be handled directly by the community, cutting out the middle man of the government.

    Whether this could work or not is another dilemma, and one I cannot answer.

    • Kalothar@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just don’t believe that could work at the global scale for scientific advancement. Government or not we need regulated research and technology. You need a government to do that because otherwise what would be the punishment?

      I just can’t see it working on the large scale.

      • moozogew@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think whatever the system we use we need to develop the technology to enable verification and proof based systems.

        whatever the system people will lie, cheat, and manipulate so none of them will work properly until we have ways of confirming claims built into all our systems from scientific research, media and technology right to politics and maybe even ever day speech.