(link is to the Supreme Court’s opinion document)

  • Gork@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    We would probably have a better Supreme Court even if we had arbitrary requirements that make little sense but would be a better alternative to what we have now. For instance:

    • All Justices must have the name Horatio (either a given name or by name change). No last names.

    • Twenty years of experience required in horticulture, which because of the forementioned name change, is more like horatioculture.

    • Must have read at least 3000 books of any type.

    • Can juggle an arbitrary amount of oranges on demand.

    • Has combat experience in either blunt or bladed weaponry in the event of a zombie apocalypse, with a skill level scaled to their age. Alternatively, skilled in the occult and necromancy (to turn the undead).

    • Can create rhythmic song related to the laws being discussed in the event of spontaneous musicals.