• themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    You are not making bad points in your comment, but your first paragraph threw everyone off. As it should.

    I get where you are going to let Apple reveal software code for end-of-life devices, but I can’t see why it is related to the USB-C law. The law is not about Apple, but all devices. That’s why it’s good for e-waste.

    And it’s true - no current owner of an iPhone with lightning will feel this. It’s harmless for consumers. But as soon as they get the USB-C port, they’ll know what they missed not having to bring their charger freaking everywhere.

    • nicerdicer@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Don’t get me wrong - I’m all in favor of the EU Directive that states that all such devices must have the same charging port from now on. I think that this should have been introduced way earlier.

      I also realize that this law doesn’t apply to Apple exclusively, but you don’t find the Lightning port on any other non-Apple devices. If the Lightning port didn’t exist at all, Apple devices probably would have been equipped with USB C ports instead.

      But one thing that affects all kind of devices is that they will be outdated at least software-wise mostly deliberately, no matter what charging port they are euqipped with. This even happens with Android-based phones, as there is a wide range of phones that can’t be fixed with alternative software (ie. Graphene, LinageOS and similar).

      In my opinon it should be law that manufacturors should allow for end-of-service-devices to be opened up and upgraded with an alternative OS/ software, to extend liftime and to avoid being discarded. This affects mobile phones as well as smart lightbulbs, headphones, or vacuum robots and many more. This indeed has nothing to do with the EU Directive for charging ports, but it could have been another step towards keeping devices longer in the life cycle and thus avoiding landfill.

      Too many devices are being bricked by manufacturers deliberatly, and there are barely any ways to repair such devices, because manufacturers do not let it happen.

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        It was introduced long ago and in the spirit of the law it gave manufacturers a decade to switch to the new standard, phase out the old connectors and sell off their old stock. If manufacturers chose to stick with the old until the last minute…

        The same happened with GDPR. It was introduced with a lead in time of 5 years… everyone ignored it until it was mandatory and then everyone panicked and scrambled. If you wait to start your homework until the evening before it’s due, there will be stress.