• nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    269
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    sometimes you bring on a ceo just to get some controversial thing done. they can eat the blame and then leave

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        So replacing a woman with a woman, and then bringing back the original woman is what made you think the fall person had to be a woman? Reddit may have done so… but I find it hard to believe this was sex/gender related. Otherwise it would have made more sense to replace the woman with a man, have him take the fall and go back to Whitney so it made her / the company look better long term.

      • CorpuscularCrumpet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        This is moronic and sexist.

        History is full of males that were suckered into taking the fall.

        Saying that women alone are incompetent to the point of always being suckered into a CEO position to be the fall gal is peak misogynism.

        Think things through a little before posting.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          What is “the glass cliff”, Alex.

          Sorry that stating the existence of this systemic sexism is apparently sexist. Guess I’m sexist?

    • Kuma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Exactly this, they are usually young too and they know their only job is to fire ppl and/or do decisions that will make most if not all unhappy. I have only seen it once my self but a lot of friends went through that at their company.

      • nutsack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        the sad part is the act they put on coming in. many at the company will think this is a real hire that will bring about good cultural change

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 day ago

      They called it an Axe Man, in my time. I’ve been at two companies hit with them, and I follow them AND the CEO who stepped down (once a reverted permanent one and the other a long-term leave) to see which companies are fucked next.

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m embarrassed it took me so long to realize this. Somebody explained that to me recently, within the context of a conversation about layoffs. That CEO had no prior CEO experience, was only there for less than a year, and was part of the board of directors. In hindsight it seems so obvious.