• Hubi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t say I agree with that take, I thought it was one of the better Indiana Jones movies, maybe even better than Temple Of Doom. It ticked all the boxes for me.

    • skribe@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe even better than Temple of Doom

      They should put that on the posters.

      Damned with faint praise, indeed.

    • DocWurzel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here, I enjoyed the film. It portrayed Jones well as an aging person who is past their prime giving it one last shot. The action was good, the plot was enjoyable, the Nazis got a kicking. What’s not to like?

      • Rimorso@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Basically all the chase scenes were camera glued 10 cm from the protagonists and shaky cam for 15 minutes at a time.

        • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh noooooo! I was just rewatching Raiders the other day and thinking about how good the camera work was, and how if they shot it today half of those fight scenes would be incomprehensible shaky cam. Sad to hear that Dial has fallen to the shaky side.