not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agospectrum rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1617arrow-down15
arrow-up1612arrow-down1external-linkspectrum rulelemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squareGinny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 months agoYou’re assuming gayness is both integral one-dimensional and integral. Personally, I think gayness is homomorphic to the set ℝ².
minus-squarelugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoAccording to that logic, straightness would be heteromorphic to the set ℝ². Destroyed by pure logic
minus-squareborokov@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoYou’re right, I’ve mixed denombrability of the set and sortability of the measure (don’t know if it is the right words in engkish). On my side, I’m not sure about dimension or continuity of gayness norm.
minus-squarevrojak@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoSo instead of general gayness, you have an axis for twink attraction and bear attraction?
You’re assuming gayness is both integral one-dimensional and integral.
Personally, I think gayness is homomorphic to the set ℝ².
According to that logic, straightness would be heteromorphic to the set ℝ².
Destroyed by pure logic
You’re right, I’ve mixed denombrability of the set and sortability of the measure (don’t know if it is the right words in engkish).
On my side, I’m not sure about dimension or continuity of gayness norm.
So instead of general gayness, you have an axis for twink attraction and bear attraction?