• atrielienz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s kind of moving the goal posts. The shareholders definitely put pressure on the CEO and leadership of a company. And I think they should be held responsible in some cases for the fallout of badly enacted anti-consumer policies. On the other hand though, the CEO is the leadership who is held responsible for enacting policy.

      • SapphironZA@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s probably something they already budget for. I would argue for lawyers fees being capped and the fines being 5x the value of the damage done.