dwazou@lemm.ee to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-217 days agoIs red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the oppositepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govexternal-linkmessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up1600arrow-down115
arrow-up1585arrow-down1external-linkIs red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the oppositepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govdwazou@lemm.ee to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-217 days agomessage-square107fedilink
minus-squarei_love_FFT@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·16 days agoWhat if the sponsor is the blanket university funding for a professor’s research? It may have some bias, but there is no steak in the actual result. I expect to see “these results call for more research on the topic”, but that’s pretty much it.
minus-squarelmmarsano@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·16 days ago steak stake? Accepting funding from sponsors responsible for pollution & publishing environmental toxicology studies that disfavor those sponsors was pretty common at the university medical office where I worked.
What if the sponsor is the blanket university funding for a professor’s research? It may have some bias, but there is no steak in the actual result.
I expect to see “these results call for more research on the topic”, but that’s pretty much it.
stake?
Accepting funding from sponsors responsible for pollution & publishing environmental toxicology studies that disfavor those sponsors was pretty common at the university medical office where I worked.