• dumples@midwest.socialEnglish
    3·
    1 day ago

    My favorite way to share files is to compose an email and attach the file. I then save it as a draft and then go to another computer and open that draft and download the file. Its the best method and it has worked for at least a decade. Sometimes you have to send it to yourself but the method is perfect

    • bampop@lemmy.world
      1·
      1 day ago

      Another quick fix is to set up a “Note to Self” group in Signal (make a group with 2 people then remove the other member). Nice tidy way to move things around, with a history of things you moved earlier

  • mcv@lemm.eeEnglish
    6·
    2 days ago

    I recently wanted to send a file from Linux to an old tablet over Bluetooth. Can’t be done apparently. I can send it to my phone, a windows laptop can send it to the tablet, but my Linux PC apparently can’t. Still baffled about it.

  • shutz@lemmy.ca
    17·
    2 days ago

    My own pet peeve is UI components whose associated action is divorced from the components interaction feedback.

    For example, a button that seems visibly pressed (even lights up! Maybe there’s even audio or haptic feedback!) but once you release, nothing actually happens because you were supposed to press it or hold it down for slightly longer.

    This even happens with physical controls: in some elevators you can press a floor button such that it lights up momentarily, and even beeps, and yet the elevator doesn’t register the command and you have to press again, longer.

    • Rednax@lemmy.world
      9·
      2 days ago

      I have this experience with a certain type of pedestrian traffic light “button”.

      I quote button, because nothing physically moves when you press it. I’m not sure if it registers pressure or heat, but you don’t even feel anything move when you press it.

      Usually when you press the button, a red text lights up on the button, telling you to wait. This text gives you feedback that the button registered your press, and the traffic light will schedule a green light for you.

      However, sometimes you didn’t press hard enough, and the text doesn’t light up. Simple solution: press harder.

      But there is a scenario where it doesn’t matter how hard you press, the button won’t light up. You keep staring at it, while slamming the damn thing with the fury of a Hulk wealding Mjolnir. Still, nothing lights up. The reason: the light instantly went green, so it never needed to light up the text telling you to wait. And all that time slamming your fist on the button, could have been spend crossing the intersection. Instead you have been standing there, looking like a drunk person having a fistfight with an inanimate object.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      5·
      2 days ago

      I’ve actually noticed this exact thing with elevators before… I was kind of amazed the beep and light were hooked up completely independently from the actual floor selection logic.
      It sort of makes sense that the light in the button would just be hooked directly up to the button contacts. The computer would then be polling the buttons separately and it’s possible to miss a button press… These sorts of buttons shouldn’t need a debounce period since pressing any of them a second time doesn’t do anything. If the buttons were interrupt based, this probably wouldn’t happen.

  • andybytes@programming.devEnglish
    141·
    2 days ago

    I wanna… I have a dream where computers don’t create their own problems to solve and are not used to shoehorn in the desires of rich people and give us a future that we didn’t ask for.

  • who@feddit.orgEnglish
    792·
    3 days ago
    1. Getting users to post text instead of screenshots of text.
      • who@feddit.orgEnglish
        0·
        3 days ago

        If only there was a way to copy text, and then paste it someplace else. Sigh… unsolved problems.

        • Ephera@lemmy.mlEnglish
          1·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, really unfortunate that that’s not possible. Always having to take a screenshot and then type out letter by letter what’s on the screenshot, that can be quite annoying.

          But even if copying text was possible, the reason people post pictures of text is to give proper attribution, but also to distance themselves from the content, so that it’s clear that they don’t necessarily hold the exact same opinion or that they might not have all the knowledge to defend the statements in the post.

          Cross-posting could fill that same roll without screenshotting text.

          • who@feddit.orgEnglish
            2·
            2 days ago

            the reason people post pictures of text is to give proper attribution, but also to distance themselves from the content,

            If only we had some way to reference an original source. Something like a figurative link, if you will.

            • Ephera@lemmy.mlEnglish
              2·
              2 days ago

              That would be cool, but human brains are weirdos. If you’re already copying text, you could’ve edited or annotated it, for example. For example, if it’s an opinion you don’t entirely agree with, you might feel obliged to say so, because you have the ability to do so when it’s a text post.

              If you want to call that irrational, I’m not arguing against that. I’m just saying it’s the reality we live in and I’d like to have tooling to deal with that better, because I would also prefer text to not be screenshotted.

  • nogooduser@lemmy.worldEnglish
    29·
    3 days ago

    I’m pretty sure that 5 is a feature because the button that moved is usually replaced with a clickable ad.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      12·
      2 days ago

      I love it so much when reddit lemmy clients think they are smarter and they renumber points 5 to 1 as 5 to 9…

      edit: oops, still sometimes writing reddit instead of lemmy after almost 2 years…

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            1·
            2 days ago

            This here is apparently the original source of the markdown specification, and there it clearly says that this is the correct behaviour: https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#list

            Ordered lists use numbers followed by periods:

            1. Bird
            2. McHale
            3. Parish

            It’s important to note that the actual numbers you use to mark the list have no effect on the HTML output Markdown produces. The > HTML Markdown produces from the above list is:

            <ol> <li>Bird</li> <li>McHale</li> <li>Parish</li> </ol>

            If you instead wrote the list in Markdown like this:

            1. Bird
            2. McHale
            3. Parish

            or even:

            1. Bird
            2. McHale
            3. Parish

            you’d get the exact same HTML output

              • squaresinger@lemmy.world
                1·
                1 day ago

                The only difference to the standard that I see is that the standard says it should be 1,2,3,4,5, while at least for me it renders as 5,6,7,8,9.

                But that’s probably because it doesn’t render as HTML and thus doesn’t rely on HTML to do the numbering.

  • Redkey@programming.dev
    111·
    2 days ago

    For 2, one of the few pieces of Windows software that I haven’t been able to replace in Linux is GetRight. Many HTTP servers support downloads starting at an offset from the beginning of the file, and GetRight uses that to allow download pausing and resumption.

    It was a real life saver back when I had an extremely flaky Internet connection.

    EDIT: Thanks for all the suggestions, I’ll definitely take a look at them. Simply resuming downloads is why I initally started using GetRight, but it also came with a bunch of other useful tools that I came to rely on. While I’ve been able to replicate some of the basic functionality with individual browser plugins or programs, I haven’t seen anything that integrates it all so well, with such a smooth interface. I haven’t looked for a long time, though, so maybe one of your suggestions will be the one!

    • RaccoonBall@lemm.ee
      11·
      2 days ago

      Wow, getright! That’s a throwback. I used that in the 90s.

      On linux I use aria2c for similar tasks. It can resume http downloads, as well as split them up into multiple threads for faster downloading.

      It’s cli-based and powerful (therefore perhaps a bit confusing at first), but there are UIs for it as well for a more get-rightty experience.

      I think jdownloader also has some application here, though it’s mostly for getting things from those ad-filled file hosting sites frequently used by those on the high seas

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        0·
        2 days ago

        Why would you multithread it except for heaving mutiple paths of entry to your home connection or you are getting a throttle from the file hoster?

  • Flipper@feddit.org
    5·
    3 days ago

    Honestly, when I open a new application I normally want to interact with it now. Always drove me nuts , when I opened a Powershell window in a folder and then had to click on it again.

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      4·
      2 days ago

      I think it’d be nice if there was an OS-app version of the web browser middle-click. I never feel confused about whether an opened link is or is not taking focus because I shared my intent by which mouse button I used (left: open and switch, middle: just open).

    • Kairos@lemmy.todayOP
      7·
      3 days ago

      Until its a popup and you’re entering a password.

      Or it took several seconds to load.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          2·
          2 days ago

          I use Syncthing for other purposes, but I think it’s pretty complicated for a one-off transfer.

          given that most people use windows, it is:

          • download exe
          • run exe
          • attempt to teach the other person to not be scared of the “hacker window” that popped up
          • exchange IDs
          • accept folder, find a place for it

          exchangeing IDs is especially tricky if you both are in a call, and the PC does not have a messaging account that can reach you, because they live on their phones or something

          • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
            0·
            2 days ago

            Probably not basic user friendly, true, but the upside is that you set it up once and can send files all the time by just placing it in a directory, doesn’t get simpler than that.

            • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              1·
              2 days ago

              ok, but most of the times this would be useful I wouldn’t send another in the foreseeable future, probably even in multiple years