• uniquethrowagay@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cool graph and all, but nuclear power is not the way to go. It’s slow to construct, not flexible at all and very expensive. Building new reactors just isn’t viable when there’s wind and solar.

    • deft@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s slow to construct,

      This often has to do with expertise and demand. If we aren’t building them often, it becomes more difficult to build them.

      not flexible at all

      What does this mean? It boils water. How flexible does it have to be to boil water?

      very expensive.

      So is the environmental crisis.

      • bonesawmcl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Expertise is definitely a problem with new fission plants. My neighbor is a pensioner in his 70s and is currently the only guy in Europe able to calculate and certify some very niche/specific concrete anchors for reactor shielding.

      • amelia@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not flexible means you can’t just switch a nuclear power plant on or off when power is needed or not needed. It takes days.

    • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It very much is the way to go for many countries. Nuclear is expensive, but it takes up significantly less space, and is significantly more stable than solar and wind. They all should be used, but saying nuclear is “not the way to go” is flat out wrong.