Here’s Matrix CEOs answer to this article: https://lobste.rs/c/jekh0n – according to him the article is absurd amounts of FUD

  • kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think it’d help them a lot to disable new signups on the m.org home server for a while and direct people to some of the other popular options, they spend too much on their own example server imo

    • kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Personally have been hosting my own server for me and friends. Cheaper and easier than I expected it to be 🤠

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It is a bit counter-intuitive but restricting new signups will not help them much. The way the matrix protocol is designed, i.e. replicating everything on every server, means that clients connecting to their server have only a minor impact. As long as most rooms of the entire matrix network are replicated on the matrix.org homeserver their costs will stay high and there isn’t really much they can do about that other than shutting it down entirely.

      • 2910000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        As long as most rooms of the entire matrix network are replicated on the matrix.org homeserver

        Is this a dealbreaker for people though?

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          There is not much they can do about it short of shutting down the entire server. Due to how matrix functions internally any sufficiently large federated homeserver replicates most of the entire network.