• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    He was convinced and his leniency is due to lack of direct involvement and being young. His sentence is house arrest.

    All of this is in the article.

    • utopianfiat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lack of direct involvement? He showed up! He stole a riot shield! He maced people! He pushed towards breaking into the capitol!

      What more do you need???

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am telling you what the judge considered in his judgment, not what I think about this person.

        • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, we can read. We don’t need you to repeat it. Don’t espouse views you don’t hold. It makes you look like an idiot

    • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      a “lack of direct involvement” would be something like showing up to the Capitol to protest, happening to be right in the gray area between the peaceful protestors and the violent ones, and getting rounded up by the capitol police who mistook you for one of the violent ones.

      Stealing a riot shield and macing people is the textbook definition of direct involvement.

    • Turducken@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Kids will be kids! They do dumb stuff all the time like busting mailboxes, tagging grafitti, stealing road signs, and stealing a riot shield during an insurrection.