sunnie@sopuli.xyz to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agolinux rulesopuli.xyzimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up11.1Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imagelinux rulesopuli.xyzsunnie@sopuli.xyz to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-squaremax@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoParts of plans that were specifically grown for livestock that we won’t eat, that is. At least a big part.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoi’m talking about waste product from our crops, like cottonseed from the textile industry or soymeal leftover from making soybean oil or silage.
minus-squareFeydaikin@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoAnd he’s talking about crops specifically grown for livestock. Of which there is quite a lot. Hell, even pets that aren’t considered live-stock outright, like Horses, consume tremendous amounts of feed that isn’t just by-products.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year ago And he’s talking about crops specifically grown for livestock. what i said was true. what they said wasn’t nuance, it was stated as a contradiction. your framing of it as nuance is a red herring.
Parts of plans that were specifically grown for livestock that we won’t eat, that is. At least a big part.
i’m talking about waste product from our crops, like cottonseed from the textile industry or soymeal leftover from making soybean oil or silage.
And he’s talking about crops specifically grown for livestock. Of which there is quite a lot. Hell, even pets that aren’t considered live-stock outright, like Horses, consume tremendous amounts of feed that isn’t just by-products.
what i said was true. what they said wasn’t nuance, it was stated as a contradiction. your framing of it as nuance is a red herring.