• force@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    what’s wrong with webp? it’s a significantly more efficient file format (like 20% less file size for the same quality) and is supported everywhere by now. if anything, the default should be webp for image types that can be both lossy and losslessly compressed

      • force@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I haven’t come across a single image or video editor that doesn’t support webp nowadays. I use paint.net, krita, aseprite, inkscape, ibis paint x, opentoonz, and davinci resolve, plus libreoffice if you count that, they all support importing/exporting and editing webp just as any other image file format. I’m pretty sure GIMP and Photoshop do too but I don’t use them so I can’t say for sure

        I feel like a majority of people have to go out of their way to make webp an inconvenience in the modern day.

        Besides, if it for some reason doesn’t work in a specific situation you need it you can just manually change the extension to “.jpeg” or “.png” and Windows/Linux/Android file managers will automatically convert it. But I can guess most people don’t actually face a situation like that.

        • kellyaster@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          you can just manually change the extension to “.jpeg” or “.png” and Windows/Linux/Android file managers will automatically convert it

          Thank you for the suggestion, but that’s not how it works. Changing a file’s extension doesn’t change the file type; it just changes the name.