• TwoGems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    How useful if a dictator gets in. I’m sure they’ll care. How about voting rights bills? Stopping gerrymandering? No?

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          Got bad news for you, Dems gerrymander just as much in the northern states, :/ the reason it’s not stopped is because it benefits both parties.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You need to read your own link btw. Gerrymandering started before there was even a split between the two parties. It’s been going on for over a century and isn’t going to go away. Acting like the Dems only do it because the repubs do is naive.

          • Water@real.lemmy.fan
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is exactly right - of course, there may be some gerrymandering forced in, but often times a consensus is reached by sitting legislators locally to gerrymander local districts because it can ensure the political longevity of both the left/right candidates who do it.

            Amazing to me that we would have “progressives” downvoting this comment - as if there’s real faith that the Democrat party has their best interests at heart, lol.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yea I don’t know why people are down voting it. Gerrymandering has been going on for over a century, and it’s not going to stop, because both parties benefit from it. It’s odd how often progressives will defend Dems, and as you said… they don’t have their best interests in mind at all, like hold them to a higher standard. Just saying “well at least they’re not Republicans” is not a good thing.

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You say gerrymander, I say “reverse republican gerrymandering”, but the result is an election that doesn’t have districts that look like ducks.