In trials

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not active suppression most of the time,

    This is your initial claim, though.

    • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, apologies if I come off as aggressive at any point, I still have a lot of residual anger over what I experienced with my former career.

    • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, my initial claim was:

      Curing diabetes isn’t as profitable as selling insulin. That’s why it doesn’t get funded.

      Then you opined that whoever comes up with a cure wins, which should be true in a perfect world. In fact, most researchers would agree with you.

      Unfortunately, a lot of MBA’s in these pharma companies don’t see it that way, and my reply to you was trying to outline the realities of that. I focussed more on the patent-and-bury part because this is the one method less known to the public (and less used), but underfunding research that can do a public good but isn’t profitable is a common technique by corporations in research, regardless of the discipline.

      My bad, I thought this was common knowledge, but it probably isn’t for people who aren’t in PhD/post-doc research roles.