Don’t worry about them. They have no reading comprehension. Your argument is we shouldn’t segregate when we teach black history, it should just be a part of all people’s history that we teach all of the time. You’re not advocating for less black history, if anything your advocating for more. They just want to get offended.
What is this article replacing it with? A month about oil and the civil war? Does that sound more culturally enlightening to you? We can read, we just enjoy black history month. Why is that a problem?
So your argument is none of that can be taught at any other time?
Don’t worry about them. They have no reading comprehension. Your argument is we shouldn’t segregate when we teach black history, it should just be a part of all people’s history that we teach all of the time. You’re not advocating for less black history, if anything your advocating for more. They just want to get offended.
What is this article replacing it with? A month about oil and the civil war? Does that sound more culturally enlightening to you? We can read, we just enjoy black history month. Why is that a problem?