BROWNTOWN
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
cm0002@lemmings.world to Opensource@programming.dev · 4 months ago

HDMI Forum is unwilling to disclose the 2.1 specification for open-source (Linux): according to AMD, they had submitted a functional, HDMI 2.1-compatible driver [for linux?], which the Forum rejected.

www.heise.de

external-link
message-square
28
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
1
external-link

HDMI Forum is unwilling to disclose the 2.1 specification for open-source (Linux): according to AMD, they had submitted a functional, HDMI 2.1-compatible driver [for linux?], which the Forum rejected.

www.heise.de

cm0002@lemmings.world to Opensource@programming.dev · 4 months ago
message-square
28
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
Valve: HDMI Forum Continues to Block HDMI 2.1 for Linux
www.heise.de
external-link
Technically, the Steam Machine supports HDMI 2.1. However, Valve and AMD are not allowed to offer an open-source driver for it.
  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Find me a TV that’s both designed for gaming and has a DisplayPort. Hell, find me any consumer TV with the port. Remember that the Steam Machine is intended for the living room, not a 27" gaming monitor.

    • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B015OW3GJK

      There’s always this option, could even include something like it in the box.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s a passive cable and would require DP++. Funnily enough it would also require a HDMI 2.1 capable driver.

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      https://www.philips.co.uk/c-p/559M1RYV_00/momentum-4k-hdr-display-with-ambiglow

      OLED: https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/alienware-aw5520qf-55-inch-oled-gaming-monitor

      There’s also some from Asus I think

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      https://www.amazon.com/Philips-Momentum-558M1RY-DisplayHDR1000-Replacement/dp/B08FJJB9TL

      https://www.amazon.com/PG65UQ-Monitor-Ultimate-DisplayPort-Displayhdr1000/dp/B07VTTWWWK

      https://www.amazon.com/Alienware-Gaming-Monitor-True-Life/dp/B07YSVF47Q

      https://www.bestbuy.com/product/hp-omen-emperium-65-led-4k-uhd-g-sync-ultimate-monitor-with-hdr-displayport-hdmi-usb-black-green/JJ8QRKXQX6

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Um, I said TV, and all three of these are monitors. Niche monitors at that too, none of them are even in stock.

        Furthermore, how many console gamers do you know who have a 55" Alienware monitor in their living room? I did say consumer TV as well, ya know.

        • refalo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Nice attitude.

          What is your definition of TV in this context? All of these are 55"+, some even show pictures of it in a living room…

          To me, practically any display that looks like it belongs in a living room, is a TV. IMO all of the ones I linked would qualify in that way. I realize you probably disagree, but I think it’s possible that other equally valid perspectives than your own can exist. And since you didn’t define what a TV is to you, people can only guess… so why get upset at them when they don’t just happen to have the use the exact same definition of a word?

          • Psythik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Look: It doesn’t matter what you think is and isn’t a TV, the fact of the matter is that the target market doesn’t have one of these end doesn’t care. They’ve got their $300 65" Hisense from Walmart, and guess what? Those TVs don’t have DisplayPort. That’s the point.

            Now please stop being a pedantic jerk just for the sake of and go away.

            • Lumisal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Aren’t you literally being pedantic on the definition? They’re both displays in the 55 inch range that can display media and are made for consumers.

              You’re the one who keeps moving the goalposts.

Opensource@programming.dev

opensource@programming.dev

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

Credits

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

⠀


Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 16 users / day
  • 57 users / week
  • 195 users / month
  • 1.06K users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 5.97K subscribers
  • 773 Posts
  • 2.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Pierre-Yves Lapersonne@programming.dev
  • BE: 0.19.17
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org