• lostinasea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Which is fair. Trump has indeed not been convicted of the crime. The court of public opinion would disagree but until a legal decision is handed down we should presume innocent until proven guilty.

    As for the links I found the first to be about a House resolution for impeachment based around Biden’s handling of the withdrawal from Afghanistan and some comments he had as Vice president related to it. The second is an opinion piece conflating the withdrawal with giving aid to an enemy. As the withdrawal provided the Taliban an opportunity to return to power. Nevermind that Trump started it in the first place. It seems the GOP “plan” is to throw shit at the wall and see what sticks.

    There are plenty of things to dislike Biden for but this certainly ain’t one of them

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      The people who this amendment was directly intended to bar were not convicted of underlying crimes to make them viable subjects. The courts will review these actions, but there’s nothing in the amendment that either directly or indirectly requires insurrectionists be convicted of a crime.