It probably goes against the philosophy or whatever of FOSS or Lemmy itself, but why not be a little evil so that you can actually sustain yourself? Donations can bring us far, but small non-intrusive ads can be a bliss in the skies for the people actually hosting the instance. Especially if there are millions of users uploading thousands of images and videos. This is extremely expensive.

Is running ads really that taboo?

EDIT: some people seem not to get the point of “millions of users”, which presumably includes non-techies that do not use adblockers. I mean that without ads (or mining?), no instance would be able to scale to the point where it can compete with Reddit for example. If you were to want that. And not for profit, but solely for sustainability.

  • ᴅᴜᴋᴇᴛʜᴏʀɪᴏɴ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ads on Reddit were one of the reasons that third party apps were so popular… They didn’t show them.

    The whole point is to get away from Reddit, not just make several smaller copies. No thanks. I’ve donated already, and I’ll donate again (to Jerboa, Lemmy devs, and instances if they prove their worthiness.

  • lohrun@fediverse.boo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    I run my own instance and I don’t run ads because I frankly hate seeing them myself. They clutter up the web view, cause lag on the webpage, and frankly are annoying and ugly to look at.

    I’d rather pay out of my own pocket to keep my instance going rather than run ads. Donations would be ideal to help keep it running for longer. As sad as it is, if I couldn’t keep paying the server costs and there weren’t any donations… I’d just shut the server down. I personally will never run ads on an instance I run. I don’t want to perpetuate or support the lifeless corporate greed cycle.

      • simple@lemmy.mywire.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I use https://1984.hosting (for privacy) to run my instance on a VPS. I’m using 1 core 2GB RAM VPS and that costs 10 dollars a month. So far everything looks to be running pretty well.

        There probably are cheaper VPS providers as well, so you likely will be able to go cheaper.

        • away2thestars@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          And how many users can that host? With that price there maybe not really a need to actually run ads. What work is involved with running an instance?

      • lohrun@fediverse.boo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        If it is just a single person private instance, relatively cheap (like a few USD). As you scale it up though it does quickly get pricey. I think mine is around 20-25ish/mo plus 4/mo for backups. I know some of the bigger instances are closer to 50-100/mo and it’s only going up as their users go up.

          • lohrun@fediverse.boo
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Donations seem to be plan for instances in the fediverse, I’ve heard of some other efforts to monetize instances either through advertising or subscriptions but apparently those instance were quickly defederated with.

            There was a bit of technical work to stand up my own instance but developers are working on making setting up an instance easier. I haven’t had to moderate anything on my instance yet as it is <10 users at the moment but it is definitely something you have to keep in mind as your instance grows.

  • Soltros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think I’d rather have an optional membership to support the instance with perks or something. Not reddit gold though. Lemmy silver?

  • NightOwl@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Someone who even takes the step into getting into the fediverse is probably using ad blockers for the purposes of security alone on a daily basis. I don’t see them disabling it.

  • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I’m gone if there is ads even though I’d block them. I’m sick of ads. They have ruined the internet .

    If they add a gold like feature that splits between the instance and the project that would be useful in addition to community donations.

    I’m here because its not like the rest of the internet. I run tor relays to help the network, I contribute to foss projects and I seed distros too for the greater good. There is enough of us here to keep it going.

    • killick@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve been chipping in for my mastodon server for over a year. The admin there posts the finances so we all know when it’s time to kick in again, but if we went to a paid rather than donated set-up, then I’d be OK with that. If my admin decided that he needed to run ads that were like printed newspaper ads then I wouldn’t mind so much. But ads that track me, ads that change size, ads that show up and block some or all of the screen, ads that play video and audio, pretend to be content etc are the ads I dislike and I would flee.

  • cerevant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    The point of the fediverse is that hosts can pick their own business model - free, freemium, ad-supported, subscription. Just like e-mail, you sign up with the provider who provides the type of service you think best meets your needs. If they piss you off, you move to a different provider.

    If the fediverse demands hosting for millions of users, someone will make a server to host millions.

    I personally think “big” instances should focus on user/identity management, while communities live in small groups on small instances. This lets the identity providers include/exclude with much better granularity (compared to the beehaw mess) making the communities much less susceptible to being collateral damage.

  • tallwookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    sorry, I block all ads by default. if I get popups indicating that I need to whitelist, I block elements until I never see that crap again or the site is unusable, after which I find a different site.

    no ads. never

  • maaj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Or, we could donate and not have to see ads. I’m sick of ads. Are you running or planning on running an instance with ads? I’d love to follow along and see how your journey would go.

    • arisoda@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      the same can be said about instances with millions of users uploading and downloading millions of images and videos. I’d love to follow along and see that journey would go. I mean, I hope I’m wrong but I just don’t see it being sustainable if you want to compete with reddit for example.

      • simple@lemmy.mywire.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The solution is to lean into what Lemmy (and the Fediverse) was designed to do - be decentralized.

        If we have more instances running, it would lighten the load on the larger instances (smaller instances can still subscribe to the larger one’s communities and such).

        I think ads isnt a great idea. Firstly, generic ads don’t pay much, for actual good income you need to target ads, which now digs into users privacy and from there we have a slippery slope.

  • Hedup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’d like this to be avoided as much as possible. But I am a bit weary about the fact that even small instances have to copy everything else on the Fediverse and thus will be very strained. Or do they copy the stuff only when their user wants to view it? Not sure how it works.

  • kadu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Nothing stops them from doing so.

    But I don’t think that’s the path you’ll see super often. Most people enthusiast enough to host their own instance and open it to others probably disagree with ads, and users are very likely going to reject them.

    Plus, wether we like it or not, Lemmy is majoritarily used by people with a lot of tech knowledge - the exact same group you’d expect to be running ad blocking software.

    But if federated social networks keep growing to the point they could rival a platform like Reddit, for sure some ad supported instances will coexist with user-funded ones.

    • arisoda@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’d like the idea of certain instances becoming so large that it attracts the larger populous and becomes one of the major platforms. That is if it remains to be open source and federated.

      (Edit: or just a community)

      Why is background crypto mining not used? If it’s openly communicated and is an opt-in option, people might prefer that over donation or ads.

      • NightOwl@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I consider stuff like that malware.

        Why not just skip the step and instead ask people to join a mining pool instead of what some people to be malicious utilization of their machines.

      • zalack@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I would much rather traditional ads than crypto mining. I don’t want Kbin or Lemmy to become environmentally unfriendly electricity sinks.

      • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Crypto mining has a lot of negative conotations, and for good reason. The whole crypto ecosystem is full of scammers and bad actors. And ad supported websites only have incentive to monetize more and more until they are ad infested and can only be used with an ad blocker. That’s the state of a lot of the web today. Plus most big ad networks come with user tracking baked in which is another downside.

        I’d rather have a nominal subscription model just to cover costs rather than see an ad anywhere. The cost of hosting per user can’t be much more than a dollar or two per month. Web hosting isn’t all that expensive nowadays.

      • Slartibartfast@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m probably just being idealist of whatever but personally I really hope it doesn’t. I don’t really like the idea of one instance getting so big that it has the ability to disrupt all the other ones, I’d much prefer in was all just little niche servers run by people who are passionate about the subject, even if it’s not making them any money.

        But probably it’ll all just eventually conglomerate into one big thing and then turn rotten and we’ll all have to find something else, because that always seems to be the way it goes. But these are the wild west days for this platform, enjoy it while it lasts!

        • Adda@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Ad paragraph 2: The beauty is that you do not have to only enjoy it while it lasts. FLOSS cannot end in this way. As already explained by @[email protected], if this all just conglomerates to a centralized and rotten state, you simply create another instance and federate exclusively with those instances that are not rotten. Maybe only with the smaller instances that, for example, focus on a topic you find interesting.

          You do not even have to fork and maintain anything. You simply use the SW as is, but without having to deal with the aspects that you find problematic (centralization on a few large instances and rotten admins, etc.).

        • saucyloggins@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          But that’s the beauty of ActivityPub. You can always just fork the code yourself and start a new project that could federate with Kbin and Lemmy.

  • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ads is what’s ruining everything that’s good on the internet. If you have two similar platforms and one is run by ads and one by a subscribtion model the latter is going to give you way better experience.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’d probably be fine with Old-Style Internet Ads: A Div that displays a bit of text or a small image that suggests an interesting product for the user, possibly related to the page content they’re viewing.

    But new style internet ads demand things like iframes, numerous scripts, user tracking, user anti-tracking circumvention, and attempts to weasel their way out of the small sidebar they’ve been scripted into. If there was any way for an advertising network to ban/blacklist any advertisers that do things like that, or even offer them a limited model for what they can add to a page, I’d be a little more okay with them.