• 420stalin69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah ok that’s fair, even in a transformed world there is still a need for some cars you’re right.

    My point was more that a world in which we simply exchange fords for Tesla’s is still a fucked world but you make a fair counter point.

      • sysgen [none/use name,they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Investing trillions of dollars into dead ends is, however, the enemy of progress. The ressources we’re throwing at replacing existing cars with EV cars would be enough to implement better solutions.

        • ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No technology is a dead end, you can’t run trains 30 miles out of town for 6 families already over 500 acres. Just because a technology doesn’t benefit urbanization doesn’t make it worthless.

          • sysgen [none/use name,they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not opposing the research, I’m opposing the implementation. Spending trillions of dollars because >1% of the population would be inconvenienced as you showed by having to use less developed or more expensive alternative is stupid.