• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know, generally as wealth increases birth rate decreases. Just look at the population crises coming up around the developed world.

    This is the exact opposite of why people are having fewer kids in areas with population crises.

    People generally have fewer kids in developed nations than in developing nations because all of their children are likely to survive.

    Population crises arise due to social and economic factors.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        One can easily make the argument that the children are surviving because of the increased wealth.

        That is the argument, yes

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not sure why you’re downvoted. These are absolutely the reasons. Unfortunately in some developed nations people are worked to death and buried under debt so they decide not to have kids, or are simply not left with a choice at all. Also, well educated societies can also see the world heading in a bad direction, economically, environmentally, and/or politically and decide to be responsible and not being a child into such a world. Unfortunately, the latter means we leave the world to an ever increasing population of idiots.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My only disagreement is where population crises come from. These are cultural and economic issues, generally, not necessary consequences of wealth building.

        Otherwise yeah you’re spot on