• chitak166@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eh, I think cookies should just be opt-in unless they’re absolutely necessary for the site to function.

      • FishFace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s already the case that necessary cookies don’t need permission, but websites do not abuse this to not show the prompt. This is because the legislation has teeth.

    • extant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Companies already bundle their invasive data collection with necessary features so if you block it than the website just won’t work, this would incentivise that behavior if necessary cookies are automatically approved.

    • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is what the regulation was all about. The law did not said anything about cookies, they are the core web technology, just that you must be asked for personal data processing.